Skip to main content

Cherly Gary-Furdge

Title: Adjunct Faculty

Department: Criminal Justice

College: College of Health and Public Service

Curriculum Vitae

Curriculum Vitae Link

Education

  • PhD, Texas Woman's University, 2013
    Major: Sociology

Current Scheduled Teaching

CJUS 3500.401Inequality, Crime and JusticeFall 2025 Syllabus
CJUS 5800.401Topics in Criminal JusticeFall 2025
Texas Education Code 51.974 (HB 2504) requires each institution of higher education to make available to the public, a syllabus for undergraduate lecture courses offered for credit by the institution.

Previous Scheduled Teaching

CJUS 3500.400Inequality, Crime and JusticeSpring 2025 Syllabus SPOT
CJUS 5620.400Seminar in VictimologySpring 2025 SPOT
CJUS 5620.461Seminar in VictimologySpring 2025 SPOT
CJUS 3600.400Criminology. 3600. CriminologyFall 2024 Syllabus SPOT
CJUS 3500.401Inequality, Crime and JusticeFall 2024 Syllabus SPOT
CJUS 3600.900Criminology. 3600. CriminologySummer 5W1 2024 Syllabus SPOT
CJUS 3201.900Criminal LawSpring 2024 Syllabus SPOT
CJUS 3210.900Judicial and Legal SystemsSpring 2024 Syllabus SPOT
CJUS 3201.900Criminal LawFall 2023 Syllabus SPOT
CJUS 3630.900Drugs, Crime and SocietySummer 5W1 2023 Syllabus SPOT
CJUS 4650.900VictimologySpring 2023 Syllabus SPOT
Texas Education Code 51.974 (HB 2504) requires each institution of higher education to make available to the public, a syllabus for undergraduate lecture courses offered for credit by the institution.
,
Overall
Summative Rating		 Challenge and
Engagement Index		 Response Rate

out of 5
out of 7		 %
of
students responded
  • Overall Summative Rating (median):
    This rating represents the combined responses of students to the four global summative items and is presented to provide an overall index of the class’s quality. Overall summative statements include the following (response options include a Likert scale ranging from 5 = Excellent, 3 = Good, and 1= Very poor):
    • The course as a whole was
    • The course content was
    • The instructor’s contribution to the course was
    • The instructor’s effectiveness in teaching the subject matter was
  • Challenge and Engagement Index:
    This rating combines student responses to several SPOT items relating to how academically challenging students found the course to be and how engaged they were. Challenge and Engagement Index items include the following (response options include a Likert scale ranging from 7 = Much higher, 4 = Average, and 1 = Much lower):
    • Do you expect your grade in this course to be
    • The intellectual challenge presented was
    • The amount of effort you put into this course was
    • The amount of effort to succeed in this course was
    • Your involvement in course (doing assignments, attending classes, etc.) was
CLOSE