Skip to main content

Crystal George

Title: Adjunct Faculty

Department: Rehabilitation and Health Services

College: College of Health and Public Service

Curriculum Vitae

Curriculum Vitae Link

Education

  • MS, University of North Texas, 2012
    Major: Rehabilitation Counseling
  • BA, University of North Texas, 2009
    Major: Social Science

Current Scheduled Teaching

RHAB 3100.401Disability and SocietyFall 2024 Syllabus
Texas Education Code 51.974 (HB 2504) requires each institution of higher education to make available to the public, a syllabus for undergraduate lecture courses offered for credit by the institution.

Previous Scheduled Teaching

RHAB 3100.901Disability and SocietyFall 2023 Syllabus SPOT
RHAB 4700.810Employment ServicesFall 2018 Syllabus SPOT
RHAB 4700.820Employment ServicesFall 2018 Syllabus SPOT
RHAB 3900.810Case Management in RehabilitationSummer 10W 2018 Syllabus SPOT
RHAB 3900.820Case Management in RehabilitationSummer 10W 2018 SPOT
RHAB 4700.810Employment ServicesSpring 2018 Syllabus SPOT
RHAB 4700.820Employment ServicesSpring 2018 Syllabus SPOT
RHAB 3900.810Case Management in RehabilitationFall 2017 Syllabus SPOT
RHAB 3200.810Physical and Psychosocial Aspects of Disability ISummer 10W 2017 SPOT
RHAB 3200.810Physical and Psychosocial Aspects of Disability ISpring 2017 Syllabus SPOT
RHAB 3200.820Physical and Psychosocial Aspects of Disability ISpring 2017 SPOT
UCRS 1850.002Freshman SeminarFall 2015 Syllabus SPOT
Texas Education Code 51.974 (HB 2504) requires each institution of higher education to make available to the public, a syllabus for undergraduate lecture courses offered for credit by the institution.
,
Overall
Summative Rating		 Challenge and
Engagement Index		 Response Rate

out of 5
out of 7		 %
of
students responded
  • Overall Summative Rating (median):
    This rating represents the combined responses of students to the four global summative items and is presented to provide an overall index of the class’s quality. Overall summative statements include the following (response options include a Likert scale ranging from 5 = Excellent, 3 = Good, and 1= Very poor):
    • The course as a whole was
    • The course content was
    • The instructor’s contribution to the course was
    • The instructor’s effectiveness in teaching the subject matter was
  • Challenge and Engagement Index:
    This rating combines student responses to several SPOT items relating to how academically challenging students found the course to be and how engaged they were. Challenge and Engagement Index items include the following (response options include a Likert scale ranging from 7 = Much higher, 4 = Average, and 1 = Much lower):
    • Do you expect your grade in this course to be
    • The intellectual challenge presented was
    • The amount of effort you put into this course was
    • The amount of effort to succeed in this course was
    • Your involvement in course (doing assignments, attending classes, etc.) was
CLOSE