UNT | University of North Texas

Main menu

CR Chevli

Title
Adjunct Faculty
Department
Computer Science and Engineering
College
College of Engineering

Education

Certificate, Cisco Certification, 2000.
Major: Network Design
Certificate, Cisco Certification, 2000.
Major: Networking
MS, University of North Texas, 1985.
Major: Computer Science
MSc, University of Bombay, 1982.
Major: Physics Major:Electronics
BS, University of Bombay, 1980.
Major: Physics Major:Electronic Instrumentation

Current Scheduled Teaching*

CSCE 4535.001, Introduction to Network Administration, Fall 1 2018 Syllabus

* Texas Education Code 51.974 (HB 2504) requires each institution of higher education to make available to the public, a syllabus for undergraduate lecture courses offered for credit by the institution.

Previous Scheduled Teaching*

CSCE 3605.001, Systems Administration, Spring 2018 Syllabus SPOT
CSCE 3535.001, Introduction to Network Administration, Fall 2017 Syllabus SPOT
CSCE 3605.001, Systems Administration, Spring 2017 Syllabus SPOT
CSCE 4930.001, Topics in Computer Science and Engineering, Spring 2016 Syllabus SPOT
CSCE 4930.001, Topics in Computer Science and Engineering, Spring 2015 Syllabus
CSCE 4930.001, Topics in Computer Science and Engineering, Spring 2014 Syllabus

* Texas Education Code 51.974 (HB 2504) requires each institution of higher education to make available to the public, a syllabus for undergraduate lecture courses offered for credit by the institution.

,
Overall
Summative Rating
1
Challenge and
Engagement Index
2
Response Rate
0
out of 5
0
out of 7
%
of
students responded
A Challenge and Engagement Index of "n/a" means
there were not enough student responses to calculate a score.
  • 1 Overall Summative Rating (median):
    This rating represents the combined responses of students to the four global summative items and is presented to provide an overall index of the class’s quality. Overall summative statements include the following (response options include a Likert scale ranging from 5 = Excellent, 3 = Good, and 1= Very poor):
    • The course as a whole was
    • The course content was
    • The instructor’s contribution to the course was
    • The instructor’s effectiveness in teaching the subject matter was
  • 2 Challenge and Engagement Index:
    This rating combines student responses to several SPOT items relating to how academically challenging students found the course to be and how engaged they were. Challenge and Engagement Index items include the following (response options include a Likert scale ranging from 7 = Much higher, 4 = Average, and 1 = Much lower):
    • Do you expect your grade in this course to be
    • The intellectual challenge presented was
    • The amount of effort you put into this course was
    • The amount of effort to succeed in this course was
    • Your involvement in course (doing assignments, attending classes, etc.) was
CLOSE