Skip to main content

Chris J. Hubbard

Title: Adjunct Faculty

Department: Management

College: College of Business

Curriculum Vitae

Curriculum Vitae Link

Education

  • MS, University of North Texas, 2020
    Major: Interdisciplinary Studies
    Specialization: HR Management & Communications
  • BGS, West Texas A&M University, 2017
    Major: General Studies
    Specialization: Management and Marketing

Current Scheduled Teaching

No current or future courses scheduled.

Texas Education Code 51.974 (HB 2504) requires each institution of higher education to make available to the public, a syllabus for undergraduate lecture courses offered for credit by the institution.

Previous Scheduled Teaching

BUSI 1200.501Professional Development I Strategies for BusinessSummer 5W2 2024 Syllabus SPOT
BUSI 3200.501Professional Development IIISummer 5W2 2024 Syllabus SPOT
SPDA 4011.501Integrative Seminar III: Life as a Young ProfessionalSpring 2024 Syllabus SPOT
MGMT 4470.001LeadershipSpring 2024 Syllabus SPOT
BUSI 3200.501Professional Development IIISpring 2024 Syllabus SPOT
BUSI 3660.009Professional Speaking, Writing, and Presentation in a Global EnvironmentFall 2023 Syllabus SPOT
BUSI 1200.005Professional Development I Strategies for BusinessSpring 2023 Syllabus SPOT
BUSI 1200.009Professional Development I Strategies for BusinessSpring 2022 Syllabus SPOT
BUSI 1200.010Professional Development I Strategies for BusinessFall 2021 Syllabus SPOT
Texas Education Code 51.974 (HB 2504) requires each institution of higher education to make available to the public, a syllabus for undergraduate lecture courses offered for credit by the institution.
,
Overall
Summative Rating		 Challenge and
Engagement Index		 Response Rate

out of 5
out of 7		 %
of
students responded
  • Overall Summative Rating (median):
    This rating represents the combined responses of students to the four global summative items and is presented to provide an overall index of the class’s quality. Overall summative statements include the following (response options include a Likert scale ranging from 5 = Excellent, 3 = Good, and 1= Very poor):
    • The course as a whole was
    • The course content was
    • The instructor’s contribution to the course was
    • The instructor’s effectiveness in teaching the subject matter was
  • Challenge and Engagement Index:
    This rating combines student responses to several SPOT items relating to how academically challenging students found the course to be and how engaged they were. Challenge and Engagement Index items include the following (response options include a Likert scale ranging from 7 = Much higher, 4 = Average, and 1 = Much lower):
    • Do you expect your grade in this course to be
    • The intellectual challenge presented was
    • The amount of effort you put into this course was
    • The amount of effort to succeed in this course was
    • Your involvement in course (doing assignments, attending classes, etc.) was
CLOSE