Skip to main content

Casey Goldman

Title: Adjunct Faculty

Department: Instrumental Studies

College: College of Music

Curriculum Vitae

Curriculum Vitae Link

Education

  • DMA, University of North Texas, 2019
    Major: Performance
    Dissertation: A Pedagogical Guide to the Piccolo Trumpet

Current Scheduled Teaching

MUAC 5532.707EARLY INSTRUMENTSFall 2025
MUAS 3532.707Early InstrumentsFall 2025
Texas Education Code 51.974 (HB 2504) requires each institution of higher education to make available to the public, a syllabus for undergraduate lecture courses offered for credit by the institution.

Previous Scheduled Teaching

MUAC 5532.704EARLY INSTRUMENTSSpring 2025 SPOT
MUAG 4900.744Special ProblemsSpring 2025 SPOT
MUAC 5532.707EARLY INSTRUMENTSFall 2024 SPOT
MUAG 4900.747Special ProblemsFall 2024
MUAC 1516.705TRUMPETSpring 2019 SPOT
MUAC 1516.705TRUMPETFall 2018 SPOT
MUAC 3516.705TRUMPETFall 2018 SPOT
MUAM 1516.705TrumpetFall 2018 SPOT
MUAS 1516.705TrumpetFall 2018 SPOT
MUAC 1516.705TRUMPETSpring 2018 SPOT
MUAC 3516.705TRUMPETSpring 2018 SPOT
MUAM 1516.705TrumpetSpring 2018 SPOT
MUAM 3516.705TrumpetSpring 2018 SPOT
MUAS 1516.705TrumpetSpring 2018 SPOT
MUAC 1516.705TRUMPETFall 2017 SPOT
MUAC 3516.705TRUMPETFall 2017 SPOT
MUAS 1516.705TrumpetFall 2017 SPOT
MUAC 1516.705TRUMPETSpring 2017 SPOT
MUAC 3516.705TRUMPETSpring 2017 SPOT
Texas Education Code 51.974 (HB 2504) requires each institution of higher education to make available to the public, a syllabus for undergraduate lecture courses offered for credit by the institution.
,
Overall
Summative Rating		 Challenge and
Engagement Index		 Response Rate

out of 5
out of 7		 %
of
students responded
  • Overall Summative Rating (median):
    This rating represents the combined responses of students to the four global summative items and is presented to provide an overall index of the class’s quality. Overall summative statements include the following (response options include a Likert scale ranging from 5 = Excellent, 3 = Good, and 1= Very poor):
    • The course as a whole was
    • The course content was
    • The instructor’s contribution to the course was
    • The instructor’s effectiveness in teaching the subject matter was
  • Challenge and Engagement Index:
    This rating combines student responses to several SPOT items relating to how academically challenging students found the course to be and how engaged they were. Challenge and Engagement Index items include the following (response options include a Likert scale ranging from 7 = Much higher, 4 = Average, and 1 = Much lower):
    • Do you expect your grade in this course to be
    • The intellectual challenge presented was
    • The amount of effort you put into this course was
    • The amount of effort to succeed in this course was
    • Your involvement in course (doing assignments, attending classes, etc.) was
CLOSE