Skip to main content

Cortney Haynes

Title: Lecturer

Department: Teacher Education and Administration

College: College of Education

Curriculum Vitae

Curriculum Vitae Link

Education

  • MEd, University of North Texas, 2020
    Major: Curriculum and Instruction
  • BA, University of North Texas, 2014
    Major: Social Science

Current Scheduled Teaching

EDCI 4840.001Instructional Strategies and Classroom ManagementSpring 2025
EDCI 4108.755Student Teaching in the Secondary SchoolFall 2024 Syllabus
EDCI 4118.755Student Teaching in the Secondary SchoolFall 2024 Syllabus

Previous Scheduled Teaching

EDCI 4108.758Student Teaching in the Secondary SchoolSpring 2024 Syllabus SPOT
EDCI 4118.758Student Teaching in the Secondary SchoolSpring 2024 Syllabus SPOT
EDCI 5108.758Student Teaching in the Secondary SchoolsSpring 2024
EDCI 5118.757Student Teaching in the Secondary SchoolsSpring 2024
EDEE 3340.014Teaching Social Studies EC 6Spring 2024 Syllabus SPOT
EDEE 3340.006Teaching Social Studies EC 6Fall 2023 Syllabus SPOT
EDEE 3340.011Teaching Social Studies EC 6Spring 2023 Syllabus SPOT
EDEE 3340.016Teaching Social Studies EC 6Spring 2023 Syllabus SPOT
EDEE 3340.025Teaching Social Studies EC 6Spring 2023 Syllabus SPOT
EDEE 3340.601Teaching Social Studies EC 6Spring 2023 Syllabus SPOT
EDEE 3340.022Teaching Social Studies EC 6Fall 2022 Syllabus SPOT
EDEE 3340.024Teaching Social Studies EC 6Fall 2022 Syllabus SPOT
EDEE 3340.025Teaching Social Studies EC 6Fall 2022 Syllabus SPOT
EDEE 3340.601Teaching Social Studies EC 6Fall 2022 Syllabus SPOT
,
Overall
Summative Rating
Challenge and
Engagement Index
Response Rate

out of 5

out of 7
%
of
students responded
  • Overall Summative Rating (median):
    This rating represents the combined responses of students to the four global summative items and is presented to provide an overall index of the class’s quality. Overall summative statements include the following (response options include a Likert scale ranging from 5 = Excellent, 3 = Good, and 1= Very poor):
    • The course as a whole was
    • The course content was
    • The instructor’s contribution to the course was
    • The instructor’s effectiveness in teaching the subject matter was
  • Challenge and Engagement Index:
    This rating combines student responses to several SPOT items relating to how academically challenging students found the course to be and how engaged they were. Challenge and Engagement Index items include the following (response options include a Likert scale ranging from 7 = Much higher, 4 = Average, and 1 = Much lower):
    • Do you expect your grade in this course to be
    • The intellectual challenge presented was
    • The amount of effort you put into this course was
    • The amount of effort to succeed in this course was
    • Your involvement in course (doing assignments, attending classes, etc.) was
CLOSE