Skip to main content

Chan Kim

Title: Adjunct Faculty

Department: World Languages, Literatures, and Cultures

College: College of Liberal Arts and Social Sciences

Curriculum Vitae

Curriculum Vitae Link

Education

  • Certificate, Arizona State University, 2019
    Major: Literary Translation Studies
  • MLS, Arizona State University, 2017
    Major: Liberal Studies
    Specialization: Film and Media Studies
  • BS, Chung-Ang University, 2009
    Major: Engineering

Current Scheduled Teaching

KORE 2050.001Intermediate KoreanSpring 2025
KORE 2040.001Intermediate KoreanFall 2024 Syllabus
Texas Education Code 51.974 (HB 2504) requires each institution of higher education to make available to the public, a syllabus for undergraduate lecture courses offered for credit by the institution.

Previous Scheduled Teaching

KORE 1020.001Elementary KoreanSpring 2024 Syllabus SPOT
LANG 2050.001Intermediate LanguageSpring 2024 Syllabus SPOT
KORE 1010.001Elementary KoreanFall 2023 Syllabus SPOT
KORE 1010.002Elementary KoreanFall 2023 Syllabus SPOT
KORE 1020.001Elementary KoreanFall 2023 Syllabus SPOT
LANG 2040.001Intermediate LanguageFall 2023 Syllabus SPOT
LANG 1010.001Elementary LanguageSpring 2023 Syllabus SPOT
LANG 1020.001Elementary LanguageSpring 2023 Syllabus SPOT
LANG 1020.002Elementary LanguageSpring 2023 Syllabus SPOT
LANG 1010.001Elementary LanguageFall 2022 Syllabus SPOT
LANG 1010.003Elementary LanguageFall 2022 Syllabus SPOT
Texas Education Code 51.974 (HB 2504) requires each institution of higher education to make available to the public, a syllabus for undergraduate lecture courses offered for credit by the institution.
,
Overall
Summative Rating		 Challenge and
Engagement Index		 Response Rate

out of 5
out of 7		 %
of
students responded
  • Overall Summative Rating (median):
    This rating represents the combined responses of students to the four global summative items and is presented to provide an overall index of the class’s quality. Overall summative statements include the following (response options include a Likert scale ranging from 5 = Excellent, 3 = Good, and 1= Very poor):
    • The course as a whole was
    • The course content was
    • The instructor’s contribution to the course was
    • The instructor’s effectiveness in teaching the subject matter was
  • Challenge and Engagement Index:
    This rating combines student responses to several SPOT items relating to how academically challenging students found the course to be and how engaged they were. Challenge and Engagement Index items include the following (response options include a Likert scale ranging from 7 = Much higher, 4 = Average, and 1 = Much lower):
    • Do you expect your grade in this course to be
    • The intellectual challenge presented was
    • The amount of effort you put into this course was
    • The amount of effort to succeed in this course was
    • Your involvement in course (doing assignments, attending classes, etc.) was
CLOSE