Skip to main content

Cary Jim

Title: Adjunct Faculty

Department: Information Science

College: College of Information

Curriculum Vitae

Curriculum Vitae Link

Education

  • PhD, University of North Texas, 2022
    Major: Information Science
    Specialization: Data Science
    Dissertation: Digital Equity in K-12 Education: Conceptualization and Analysis of Students' Digital Opportunity
  • MAT, The University of Texas at Dallas, 2010
    Major: Science Education
  • BS, Texas Woman's Unviersity, 2005
    Major: Dietetics and Institutional Administration

Current Scheduled Teaching

INFO 5307.021Knowledge Management Tools and TechnologiesFall 2024 Syllabus

Previous Scheduled Teaching

INFO 4745.001Information ArchitectureSummer 10W 2024 Syllabus SPOT
INFO 5307.001Knowledge Management Tools and TechnologiesFall 2023 SPOT
INFO 5307.021Knowledge Management Tools and TechnologiesFall 2023 SPOT
INFO 4745.001Information ArchitectureSpring 2023 Syllabus SPOT
INFO 5307.001Knowledge Management Tools and TechnologiesFall 2022 Syllabus SPOT
INFO 5307.021Knowledge Management Tools and TechnologiesFall 2022 Syllabus SPOT
INFO 5307.202Knowledge Management Tools and TechnologiesFall 2020 Syllabus SPOT

Contracts, Grants and Sponsored Research

    Grant - Service

  • Dooley, Y. (Principal), Jim, C. (Supporting), Monahan, J. (Supporting), Sittel, R. (Supporting), "Tackling the Digital Divide in Texas," sponsored by Dean's Innovation Grant / UNT Libraries, University of North Texas, $5000 Funded. (2021 - 2022).
,
Overall
Summative Rating
Challenge and
Engagement Index
Response Rate

out of 5

out of 7
%
of
students responded
  • Overall Summative Rating (median):
    This rating represents the combined responses of students to the four global summative items and is presented to provide an overall index of the class’s quality. Overall summative statements include the following (response options include a Likert scale ranging from 5 = Excellent, 3 = Good, and 1= Very poor):
    • The course as a whole was
    • The course content was
    • The instructor’s contribution to the course was
    • The instructor’s effectiveness in teaching the subject matter was
  • Challenge and Engagement Index:
    This rating combines student responses to several SPOT items relating to how academically challenging students found the course to be and how engaged they were. Challenge and Engagement Index items include the following (response options include a Likert scale ranging from 7 = Much higher, 4 = Average, and 1 = Much lower):
    • Do you expect your grade in this course to be
    • The intellectual challenge presented was
    • The amount of effort you put into this course was
    • The amount of effort to succeed in this course was
    • Your involvement in course (doing assignments, attending classes, etc.) was
CLOSE