Skip to main content

Carla K. Paschal

Title: Adjunct Faculty

Department: Anthropology

College: College of Liberal Arts and Social Sciences

Curriculum Vitae

Curriculum Vitae Link

Education

  • MS, University of North Texas, 2018
    Major: Applied Anthropology
    Dissertation: Exploring Food Security among Elderly Residents in Carrollton and Farmers Branch, Texas

Current Scheduled Teaching

ANTH 3101.401Issues in Contemporary American Culture and SocietySpring 2025
ANTH 3101.400Issues in Contemporary American Culture and SocietyFall 2024 Syllabus
ANTH 3101.401Issues in Contemporary American Culture and SocietyFall 2024 Syllabus
Texas Education Code 51.974 (HB 2504) requires each institution of higher education to make available to the public, a syllabus for undergraduate lecture courses offered for credit by the institution.

Previous Scheduled Teaching

ANTH 3101.201Issues in Contemporary American Culture and SocietySpring 2024 SPOT
ANTH 3101.200Issues in Contemporary American Culture and SocietyFall 2023 Syllabus SPOT
ANTH 3101.201Issues in Contemporary American Culture and SocietyFall 2023 SPOT
ANTH 3101.200American Culture and SocietySpring 2023 Syllabus SPOT
ANTH 3101.201American Culture and SocietySpring 2023 Syllabus SPOT
ANTH 3101.201American Culture and SocietyFall 2022 Syllabus SPOT
ANTH 3101.201American Culture and SocietySpring 2022 Syllabus SPOT
Texas Education Code 51.974 (HB 2504) requires each institution of higher education to make available to the public, a syllabus for undergraduate lecture courses offered for credit by the institution.
,
Overall
Summative Rating		 Challenge and
Engagement Index		 Response Rate

out of 5
out of 7		 %
of
students responded
  • Overall Summative Rating (median):
    This rating represents the combined responses of students to the four global summative items and is presented to provide an overall index of the class’s quality. Overall summative statements include the following (response options include a Likert scale ranging from 5 = Excellent, 3 = Good, and 1= Very poor):
    • The course as a whole was
    • The course content was
    • The instructor’s contribution to the course was
    • The instructor’s effectiveness in teaching the subject matter was
  • Challenge and Engagement Index:
    This rating combines student responses to several SPOT items relating to how academically challenging students found the course to be and how engaged they were. Challenge and Engagement Index items include the following (response options include a Likert scale ranging from 7 = Much higher, 4 = Average, and 1 = Much lower):
    • Do you expect your grade in this course to be
    • The intellectual challenge presented was
    • The amount of effort you put into this course was
    • The amount of effort to succeed in this course was
    • Your involvement in course (doing assignments, attending classes, etc.) was
CLOSE