Skip to main content

Chih-chun Lin

Title: Adjunct Faculty

Department: Emergency Management and Disaster Science

College: College of Health and Public Service

Curriculum Vitae

Curriculum Vitae Link

Education

  • MS, Texas A&M University, 2013
    Major: Urban & Regional Planning

Current Scheduled Teaching

EADP 3010.400Principles of Emergency ManagementSpring 2025 Syllabus
Texas Education Code 51.974 (HB 2504) requires each institution of higher education to make available to the public, a syllabus for undergraduate lecture courses offered for credit by the institution.

Previous Scheduled Teaching

EADP 3010.400Principles of Emergency ManagementFall 2024 Syllabus SPOT
EMDS 5800.001Seminar in Emergency Management and Disaster ScienceSpring 2024 SPOT
Texas Education Code 51.974 (HB 2504) requires each institution of higher education to make available to the public, a syllabus for undergraduate lecture courses offered for credit by the institution.

Published Intellectual Contributions

    Book Chapter

  • Brindle, T., Huang, S., Wu, H., Lin, C., Lu, J., Lindell, M.K., Davis, C.A., Yu, K., Taciroglu, E. (2022). Households’ Protective Actions in Response to a Nighttime Earthquake: The 2018 Eastern Taiwan Earthquake. Lifelines 2022: Advancing Lifeline Engineering for Community Resilience. (1) 397-410. Reston, VA, American Society of Civil Engineers (ASCE) Press.
,
Overall
Summative Rating		 Challenge and
Engagement Index		 Response Rate

out of 5
out of 7		 %
of
students responded
  • Overall Summative Rating (median):
    This rating represents the combined responses of students to the four global summative items and is presented to provide an overall index of the class’s quality. Overall summative statements include the following (response options include a Likert scale ranging from 5 = Excellent, 3 = Good, and 1= Very poor):
    • The course as a whole was
    • The course content was
    • The instructor’s contribution to the course was
    • The instructor’s effectiveness in teaching the subject matter was
  • Challenge and Engagement Index:
    This rating combines student responses to several SPOT items relating to how academically challenging students found the course to be and how engaged they were. Challenge and Engagement Index items include the following (response options include a Likert scale ranging from 7 = Much higher, 4 = Average, and 1 = Much lower):
    • Do you expect your grade in this course to be
    • The intellectual challenge presented was
    • The amount of effort you put into this course was
    • The amount of effort to succeed in this course was
    • Your involvement in course (doing assignments, attending classes, etc.) was
CLOSE