Skip to main content

Tina Ross

Title: Clinical Associate Professor

Department: Multidisciplinary Innovation

College: College of Applied and Collaborative Studies

Curriculum Vitae

Curriculum Vitae Link

Education

  • MA, North Dakota State University, 2002
    Major: Speech Communication

Current Scheduled Teaching

BAAS 3000.001Pathways to Civic EngagementSpring 2025
APMG 3221.520Project Workshop: IntermediateSpring 2025
CACS 2040.510Team DevelopmentSpring 2025
CACS 2000.501Applied Professional CommunicationsFall 2024 Syllabus
COMM 1010.571Introduction to CommunicationFall SDC 2024 Syllabus
COMM 1010.575Introduction to CommunicationFall SDC 2024 Syllabus
Texas Education Code 51.974 (HB 2504) requires each institution of higher education to make available to the public, a syllabus for undergraduate lecture courses offered for credit by the institution.

Previous Scheduled Teaching

BAAS 4100.703Managing a 21st Century CareerSpring 8W2 2024 Syllabus SPOT
INDS 3050.501Storytelling for Strategic and Professional CommunicationsSpring 8W2 2024 Syllabus SPOT
COMM 1010.571Introduction to CommunicationFall SDC 2023 Syllabus SPOT
COMM 1010.575Introduction to CommunicationFall SDC 2023 Syllabus SPOT
Texas Education Code 51.974 (HB 2504) requires each institution of higher education to make available to the public, a syllabus for undergraduate lecture courses offered for credit by the institution.

Published Intellectual Contributions

    Magazine/Trade Publication

  • Ross, C. (2024). Developing an AI-Themed Communication Course. Spectra. Washington DC, National Communication Association. https://www.natcom.org/spectra/developing-ai-themed-communication-course
,
Overall
Summative Rating		 Challenge and
Engagement Index		 Response Rate

out of 5
out of 7		 %
of
students responded
  • Overall Summative Rating (median):
    This rating represents the combined responses of students to the four global summative items and is presented to provide an overall index of the class’s quality. Overall summative statements include the following (response options include a Likert scale ranging from 5 = Excellent, 3 = Good, and 1= Very poor):
    • The course as a whole was
    • The course content was
    • The instructor’s contribution to the course was
    • The instructor’s effectiveness in teaching the subject matter was
  • Challenge and Engagement Index:
    This rating combines student responses to several SPOT items relating to how academically challenging students found the course to be and how engaged they were. Challenge and Engagement Index items include the following (response options include a Likert scale ranging from 7 = Much higher, 4 = Average, and 1 = Much lower):
    • Do you expect your grade in this course to be
    • The intellectual challenge presented was
    • The amount of effort you put into this course was
    • The amount of effort to succeed in this course was
    • Your involvement in course (doing assignments, attending classes, etc.) was
CLOSE