Skip to main content

Cody Demars

Title: Teaching Fellow

Department: Physics

College: College of Science

Curriculum Vitae

Curriculum Vitae Link

Current Scheduled Teaching

PHYS 1710.001MechanicsSummer 5W1 2024 Syllabus SPOT
PHYS 1710.201MechanicsSummer 5W1 2024 Syllabus SPOT

Previous Scheduled Teaching

PHYS 1052.001Solar SystemSpring 2024 Syllabus SPOT
PHYS 1052.001Solar SystemFall 2023 Syllabus SPOT
PHYS 1052.001Solar SystemSpring 2023 Syllabus SPOT
PHYS 1052.001Solar SystemFall 2022 Syllabus SPOT
PHYS 1052.501Solar SystemFall 2022
PHYS 1062.100Stars and the UniverseSummer 5W2 2021 Syllabus SPOT

Published Intellectual Contributions

    Abstracts and Proceedings

  • Ward Quintanilla, S.J., Mitchell, W. The Photodetachment Cross Section of Ps- and Elastic e^--Ps Scattering. Bulletin of the American Physical Society. 68 (7)
  • Ward Quintanilla, S.J., DeMars, C.M. (2023). Deep minima in the Coulomb-Born triply differential cross sections for electron and positron ionization of hydrogen and helium. Bulletin of the American Physical Society. 68 (7) https://meetings.aps.org/Meeting/DAMOP23/Session/K04.3
  • DeMars, C.M., Claypool, J., Ward Quintanilla, S.J., Van Reeth, P. (2021). Comparison of elastic scattering of electron, positron and positronium from helium. Bulletin of the American Physical Society. 66 (Number 6) V01.00017. American Physical Society. https://meetings.aps.org/Meeting/DAMOP21/Session/V01.17
  • DeMars, C.M., Josiah, C.J., Ward, S.J., Van Reeth, P. (2021). Comparison of phase shifts and cross sections as a function of velocity for positron, electron and positronium elastic scattering from helium. Bulletin of the American Physical Society. 66 (Number 7) GT61.00061. American Physical Society. https://meetings.aps.org/Meeting/GEC21/Session/GT61.61
,
Overall
Summative Rating
Challenge and
Engagement Index
Response Rate

out of 5

out of 7
%
of
students responded
  • Overall Summative Rating (median):
    This rating represents the combined responses of students to the four global summative items and is presented to provide an overall index of the class’s quality. Overall summative statements include the following (response options include a Likert scale ranging from 5 = Excellent, 3 = Good, and 1= Very poor):
    • The course as a whole was
    • The course content was
    • The instructor’s contribution to the course was
    • The instructor’s effectiveness in teaching the subject matter was
  • Challenge and Engagement Index:
    This rating combines student responses to several SPOT items relating to how academically challenging students found the course to be and how engaged they were. Challenge and Engagement Index items include the following (response options include a Likert scale ranging from 7 = Much higher, 4 = Average, and 1 = Much lower):
    • Do you expect your grade in this course to be
    • The intellectual challenge presented was
    • The amount of effort you put into this course was
    • The amount of effort to succeed in this course was
    • Your involvement in course (doing assignments, attending classes, etc.) was
CLOSE