Skip to main content

Colin M. Lawson

Title: Teaching Fellow

Department: Mathematics

College: College of Science

Curriculum Vitae

Curriculum Vitae Link

Current Scheduled Teaching

No current or future courses scheduled.

Texas Education Code 51.974 (HB 2504) requires each institution of higher education to make available to the public, a syllabus for undergraduate lecture courses offered for credit by the institution.

Previous Scheduled Teaching

MATH 1710.410Calculus ISpring 2023 Syllabus SPOT
MATH 1650.310Pre CalculusSpring 2022 Syllabus SPOT
MATH 1710.110Calculus ISummer 5W1 2021 Syllabus SPOT
MATH 1710.111Calculus ISummer 5W1 2021
MATH 1710.112Calculus ISummer 5W1 2021
MATH 1710.113Calculus ISummer 5W1 2021
MATH 1650.500Pre CalculusSpring 2021 Syllabus SPOT
MATH 1650.501Pre CalculusSpring 2021 Syllabus SPOT
MATH 1650.120Pre CalculusFall 2020 Syllabus SPOT
MATH 340.006Integrated Pre and Beginning AlgebraFall 2019
MATH 1650.420Pre CalculusSpring 2019 Syllabus SPOT
MATH 1650.150Pre CalculusFall 2018 Syllabus SPOT
MATH 1650.151Pre CalculusFall 2018
MATH 1650.152Pre CalculusFall 2018
MATH 1650.153Pre CalculusFall 2018
Texas Education Code 51.974 (HB 2504) requires each institution of higher education to make available to the public, a syllabus for undergraduate lecture courses offered for credit by the institution.

Published Intellectual Contributions

    Journal Article

  • Lawson, C.M., Shepler, A.V. (2024). Deformation cohomology for cyclic groups acting on polynomial rings. Journal of Pure and Applied Algebra. 228 (7) 22.
,
Overall
Summative Rating		 Challenge and
Engagement Index		 Response Rate

out of 5
out of 7		 %
of
students responded
  • Overall Summative Rating (median):
    This rating represents the combined responses of students to the four global summative items and is presented to provide an overall index of the class’s quality. Overall summative statements include the following (response options include a Likert scale ranging from 5 = Excellent, 3 = Good, and 1= Very poor):
    • The course as a whole was
    • The course content was
    • The instructor’s contribution to the course was
    • The instructor’s effectiveness in teaching the subject matter was
  • Challenge and Engagement Index:
    This rating combines student responses to several SPOT items relating to how academically challenging students found the course to be and how engaged they were. Challenge and Engagement Index items include the following (response options include a Likert scale ranging from 7 = Much higher, 4 = Average, and 1 = Much lower):
    • Do you expect your grade in this course to be
    • The intellectual challenge presented was
    • The amount of effort you put into this course was
    • The amount of effort to succeed in this course was
    • Your involvement in course (doing assignments, attending classes, etc.) was
CLOSE