Skip to main content

Casey M. Schwab

Title: Professor

Department: Accounting

College: College of Business

Curriculum Vitae

Curriculum Vitae Link

Education

  • PhD, University of Texas, 2009
    Major: Accounting
  • BS, Texas Tech University, 2002
    Major: Accounting
  • MSA, Texas Tech University, 2002
    Major: Accounting

Current Scheduled Teaching

No current or future courses scheduled.

Texas Education Code 51.974 (HB 2504) requires each institution of higher education to make available to the public, a syllabus for undergraduate lecture courses offered for credit by the institution.

Previous Scheduled Teaching

ACCT 4320.001Federal Income Taxation IIFall 2024 Syllabus SPOT
ACCT 4320.002Federal Income Taxation IIFall 2024 Syllabus SPOT
ACCT 5390.001Taxes and Business StrategyFall 2024 Syllabus SPOT
ACCT 4320.001Federal Income Taxation IIFall 2023 Syllabus SPOT
ACCT 4320.002Federal Income Taxation IIFall 2023 Syllabus SPOT
ACCT 5390.001Taxes and Business StrategyFall 2023 Syllabus SPOT
ACCT 4320.001Federal Income Taxation IISpring 2023 Syllabus SPOT
ACCT 5390.001Taxes and Business StrategyFall 2022 SPOT
ACCT 4320.001Federal Income Taxation IISpring 2022 Syllabus SPOT
ACCT 5390.001Taxes and Business StrategyFall 2021 SPOT
ACCT 4320.001Federal Income Taxation IISpring 2021 Syllabus SPOT
ACCT 5900.001Directed StudyFall 2020
Texas Education Code 51.974 (HB 2504) requires each institution of higher education to make available to the public, a syllabus for undergraduate lecture courses offered for credit by the institution.

Published Intellectual Contributions

    Journal Article

  • Schwab, C., , B., Xia, J. (2022). What Determines ETRs? The Relative Influence of Tax and Other Factors. Contemporary Accounting Research. https://doi.org/10.1111/1911-3846.12720
  • Dhaliwal, D., Goodman, T., Hoffman, P., Schwab, C. (2022). The Incidence, Valuation and Management of Tax-related Reputational Costs: Evidence from a Period of Protest. Journal of the American Taxation Association.
  • Schwab, C., Stomberg, B., Williams, B. (2022). Effective Tax Planning. The Accounting Review. 97 (1) 413-437.
  • Nessa, M., Schwab, C.M., Stomberg, B., Towery, E.M. (2020). How do IRS Resources Affect the Corporate Audit Process?. The Accounting Review. 95 (2) 311-338.
  • Ayers, B.C., Call, A.C., Schwab, C.M. (2018). Do Analysts' Cash Flow Forecasts Encourage Managers to Improve the Firm's Cash Flows? Evidence from Tax Planning. Contemporary Accounting Research. 35 (2) 767-793.
  • Edwards, A., Schwab, C., Shelvin, T. (2016). Financial Constraints and Cash Tax Savings. The Accounting Review. 91 (3) 859-881. http://dx.doi.org/10.2308/accr-51282
  • Bratten, B., Jennings, R., Schwab, C. (2016). The accuracy of disclosures for complex estimates: Evidence from reported stock option fair values. Accounting, Organizations & Society. 52 32-49. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.aos.2015.09.001
  • Ayers, B., Schwab, C., Utke, S. (2015). Noncompliance with Mandatory Disclosure Requirements: The Magnitude and Determinants of Undisclosed Permanently Reinvested Earnings.. The Accounting Review. 90 (1) 59-83. http://dx.doi.org/10.2308/accr-50853
  • Bratten, B., Jennings, R., Schwab, C.M. (2015). The Effect of Using a Lattice Model to Estimate Reported Option Values. Contemporary Accounting Research. 32 (1) 193-222. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111/1911-3846.12067
  • Mills, L., Nutter, S., Schwab, C. (2013). The Effect of Political Sensitivity and Bargaining Power on Taxes: Evidence from Federal Contractors.. The Accounting Review. 88 (3) 977-1005. http://dx.doi.org/10.2308/accr-50368
,
Overall
Summative Rating		 Challenge and
Engagement Index		 Response Rate

out of 5
out of 7		 %
of
students responded
  • Overall Summative Rating (median):
    This rating represents the combined responses of students to the four global summative items and is presented to provide an overall index of the class’s quality. Overall summative statements include the following (response options include a Likert scale ranging from 5 = Excellent, 3 = Good, and 1= Very poor):
    • The course as a whole was
    • The course content was
    • The instructor’s contribution to the course was
    • The instructor’s effectiveness in teaching the subject matter was
  • Challenge and Engagement Index:
    This rating combines student responses to several SPOT items relating to how academically challenging students found the course to be and how engaged they were. Challenge and Engagement Index items include the following (response options include a Likert scale ranging from 7 = Much higher, 4 = Average, and 1 = Much lower):
    • Do you expect your grade in this course to be
    • The intellectual challenge presented was
    • The amount of effort you put into this course was
    • The amount of effort to succeed in this course was
    • Your involvement in course (doing assignments, attending classes, etc.) was
CLOSE