Skip to main content

Carol Sterenberg

Title: Associate Librarian

Department: Library - DL - User Interfaces

College: University of North Texas

Curriculum Vitae

Curriculum Vitae Link

Education

  • MLIS, San Jose State University, 2013
    Major: Library and Information Science
  • BAS, Davenport University, 2003
    Major: Systems Analysis/Application Development

Current Scheduled Teaching

No current or future courses scheduled.

Texas Education Code 51.974 (HB 2504) requires each institution of higher education to make available to the public, a syllabus for undergraduate lecture courses offered for credit by the institution.

Previous Scheduled Teaching

No previous courses scheduled.

Texas Education Code 51.974 (HB 2504) requires each institution of higher education to make available to the public, a syllabus for undergraduate lecture courses offered for credit by the institution.

Published Intellectual Contributions

    Book Review

  • Cox, C. (2018). Stacy Ann Wittmann and Julianne T. Stam, Redesign Your Library Website. Library Quarterly. 88 (no. 2) 199-201.

    • Newsletter

  • Cox, C. (2015). Ways to Preserve Data and Make it Accessible. 40 (3) Technical Services Law Librarian. https://www.aallnet.org/tssis/wp-content/uploads/sites/17/2018/01/Technical-Services-Law-Librarian-40-3-March-2015.pdf

Contracts, Grants and Sponsored Research

    Grant - Research

  • Cox, C. (Supporting), Sheffield, C. (Co-Principal), Flinchbaugh, M. (Co-Principal), Zukowski, A. (Supporting), Owen, T. (Supporting), Sinn, R.N. (Supporting), Carter, C. (Supporting), Muñoz, T. (Supporting), "ACRL Scholarly Communication Research grant - Roadmap to the Future of Promotion and Tenure," sponsored by Association of College & Research Libraries, National, $5000 Funded. (2019 - 2020).
,
Overall
Summative Rating		 Challenge and
Engagement Index		 Response Rate

out of 5
out of 7		 %
of
students responded
  • Overall Summative Rating (median):
    This rating represents the combined responses of students to the four global summative items and is presented to provide an overall index of the class’s quality. Overall summative statements include the following (response options include a Likert scale ranging from 5 = Excellent, 3 = Good, and 1= Very poor):
    • The course as a whole was
    • The course content was
    • The instructor’s contribution to the course was
    • The instructor’s effectiveness in teaching the subject matter was
  • Challenge and Engagement Index:
    This rating combines student responses to several SPOT items relating to how academically challenging students found the course to be and how engaged they were. Challenge and Engagement Index items include the following (response options include a Likert scale ranging from 7 = Much higher, 4 = Average, and 1 = Much lower):
    • Do you expect your grade in this course to be
    • The intellectual challenge presented was
    • The amount of effort you put into this course was
    • The amount of effort to succeed in this course was
    • Your involvement in course (doing assignments, attending classes, etc.) was
CLOSE