Skip to main content

Chad T. Marlow

Title: Adjunct Faculty

Department: Mathematics

College: College of Science

Curriculum Vitae

Curriculum Vitae Link

Education

  • MS, Texas Tech University, 1998
    Major: Mathematics
    Dissertation: Experimentation with Control in a Curved Space

Current Scheduled Teaching

MATH 1190.003Business CalculusFall 2024 Syllabus
MATH 1190.011Business CalculusFall 2024 Syllabus

Previous Scheduled Teaching

MATH 1190.005Business CalculusSpring 2024 Syllabus SPOT
MATH 1190.007Business CalculusSpring 2024 Syllabus SPOT
MATH 1180.002College Math for Business, Economics and Related FieldsFall 2023 Syllabus SPOT
MATH 1180.005College Math for Business, Economics and Related FieldsFall 2023 Syllabus SPOT
MATH 1580.001Survey of Mathematics with ApplicationsSpring 2023 Syllabus SPOT
MATH 1580.003Survey of Mathematics with ApplicationsSpring 2023 Syllabus SPOT
MATH 1580.005Survey of Mathematics with ApplicationsFall 2022 Syllabus SPOT
MATH 1580.710Survey of Mathematics with ApplicationsFall 2022 Syllabus SPOT
UGMT 1300.711Tutorial Option C in Developmental MathematicsFall 2022
UGMT 1300.712Tutorial Option C in Developmental MathematicsFall 2022
MATH 1180.780College Math for Business, Economics and Related FieldsSpring 2022 Syllabus SPOT
UGMT 1300.781Tutorial Option C in Developmental MathematicsSpring 2022
UGMT 1300.782Tutorial Option C in Developmental MathematicsSpring 2022
MATH 1580.005Survey of Mathematics with ApplicationsFall 2021 Syllabus SPOT
MATH 1580.009Survey of Mathematics with ApplicationsFall 2021 Syllabus SPOT
,
Overall
Summative Rating
Challenge and
Engagement Index
Response Rate

out of 5

out of 7
%
of
students responded
  • Overall Summative Rating (median):
    This rating represents the combined responses of students to the four global summative items and is presented to provide an overall index of the class’s quality. Overall summative statements include the following (response options include a Likert scale ranging from 5 = Excellent, 3 = Good, and 1= Very poor):
    • The course as a whole was
    • The course content was
    • The instructor’s contribution to the course was
    • The instructor’s effectiveness in teaching the subject matter was
  • Challenge and Engagement Index:
    This rating combines student responses to several SPOT items relating to how academically challenging students found the course to be and how engaged they were. Challenge and Engagement Index items include the following (response options include a Likert scale ranging from 7 = Much higher, 4 = Average, and 1 = Much lower):
    • Do you expect your grade in this course to be
    • The intellectual challenge presented was
    • The amount of effort you put into this course was
    • The amount of effort to succeed in this course was
    • Your involvement in course (doing assignments, attending classes, etc.) was
CLOSE