Skip to main content

Chrisropher Scroggins

Title: Adjunct Faculty

Department: Dean's Office

College: College of Education

Curriculum Vitae

Curriculum Vitae Link

Education

  • MEd, Concordia University - Texas, 2010
    Major: Educational Administration

Current Scheduled Teaching

EDCI 5105.034Internship IFall 2024
EDCI 4108.753Student Teaching in the Secondary SchoolFall 2024 Syllabus
EDCI 4118.753Student Teaching in the Secondary SchoolFall 2024 Syllabus
Texas Education Code 51.974 (HB 2504) requires each institution of higher education to make available to the public, a syllabus for undergraduate lecture courses offered for credit by the institution.

Previous Scheduled Teaching

EDCI 4608.760Apprentice Teaching I in Mathematics, Science, and Computer ScienceSpring 2024 Syllabus
EDCI 4618.760Apprentice Teaching II in Mathematics, Science, and Computer ScienceSpring 2024 Syllabus
EDCI 4108.765Student Teaching in the Secondary SchoolSpring 2024 Syllabus
EDCI 4118.766Student Teaching in the Secondary SchoolSpring 2024 Syllabus
EDCI 5108.755Student Teaching in the Secondary SchoolsSpring 2024
EDCI 5118.755Student Teaching in the Secondary SchoolsSpring 2024
EDEE 5105.034Internship IFall 2023
EDEE 5101.762Student Teaching in EC through Grade 6Fall 2023
EDEE 5102.762Student Teaching in EC through Grade 6Fall 2023
Texas Education Code 51.974 (HB 2504) requires each institution of higher education to make available to the public, a syllabus for undergraduate lecture courses offered for credit by the institution.
,
Overall
Summative Rating		 Challenge and
Engagement Index		 Response Rate

out of 5
out of 7		 %
of
students responded
  • Overall Summative Rating (median):
    This rating represents the combined responses of students to the four global summative items and is presented to provide an overall index of the class’s quality. Overall summative statements include the following (response options include a Likert scale ranging from 5 = Excellent, 3 = Good, and 1= Very poor):
    • The course as a whole was
    • The course content was
    • The instructor’s contribution to the course was
    • The instructor’s effectiveness in teaching the subject matter was
  • Challenge and Engagement Index:
    This rating combines student responses to several SPOT items relating to how academically challenging students found the course to be and how engaged they were. Challenge and Engagement Index items include the following (response options include a Likert scale ranging from 7 = Much higher, 4 = Average, and 1 = Much lower):
    • Do you expect your grade in this course to be
    • The intellectual challenge presented was
    • The amount of effort you put into this course was
    • The amount of effort to succeed in this course was
    • Your involvement in course (doing assignments, attending classes, etc.) was
CLOSE