Skip to main content

Chelsea V. Yurkovich

Title: Adjunct Faculty

Department: Counseling and Higher Education

College: College of Education

Curriculum Vitae

Curriculum Vitae Link

Education

  • PhD, University of North Texas,
    Major: Counseling
    Specialization: Play Therapy
  • MS, Southern Methodist University, 2013
    Major: Counseling
    Specialization: Play Therapy
  • BA, Texas Tech University, 2010
    Major: Psychology

Current Scheduled Teaching

COUN 5690.004Practicum in CounselingFall 2024
Texas Education Code 51.974 (HB 2504) requires each institution of higher education to make available to the public, a syllabus for undergraduate lecture courses offered for credit by the institution.

Previous Scheduled Teaching

COUN 5660.014Advanced Counseling SkillsSummer 10W 2024 SPOT
COUN 5700.001Introduction to Play TherapySummer 10W 2024 SPOT
COUN 5690.003Practicum in CounselingSpring 2024 SPOT
COUN 5690.003Practicum in CounselingFall 2023 SPOT
COUN 5660.001Advanced Counseling SkillsSummer 10W 2023 SPOT
COUN 5700.001Introduction to Play TherapySummer 10W 2023 SPOT
COUN 5660.001Advanced Counseling SkillsSpring 2023 SPOT
COUN 5690.002Practicum in CounselingSpring 2023 SPOT
COUN 5610.001Addiction CounselingFall 2022 SPOT
COUN 5660.002Advanced Counseling SkillsFall 2022 SPOT
COUN 5610.001Addiction CounselingSummer 10W 2022 SPOT
COUN 5700.002Introduction to Play TherapySummer 10W 2022 SPOT
COUN 5610.001Addiction CounselingSpring 2022 SPOT
COUN 5690.003Practicum in CounselingSpring 2022 SPOT
COUN 5610.001Addiction CounselingFall 2021 SPOT
COUN 3640.001Group Process in Helping RelationshipsSpring 2018 Syllabus SPOT
Texas Education Code 51.974 (HB 2504) requires each institution of higher education to make available to the public, a syllabus for undergraduate lecture courses offered for credit by the institution.
,
Overall
Summative Rating		 Challenge and
Engagement Index		 Response Rate

out of 5
out of 7		 %
of
students responded
  • Overall Summative Rating (median):
    This rating represents the combined responses of students to the four global summative items and is presented to provide an overall index of the class’s quality. Overall summative statements include the following (response options include a Likert scale ranging from 5 = Excellent, 3 = Good, and 1= Very poor):
    • The course as a whole was
    • The course content was
    • The instructor’s contribution to the course was
    • The instructor’s effectiveness in teaching the subject matter was
  • Challenge and Engagement Index:
    This rating combines student responses to several SPOT items relating to how academically challenging students found the course to be and how engaged they were. Challenge and Engagement Index items include the following (response options include a Likert scale ranging from 7 = Much higher, 4 = Average, and 1 = Much lower):
    • Do you expect your grade in this course to be
    • The intellectual challenge presented was
    • The amount of effort you put into this course was
    • The amount of effort to succeed in this course was
    • Your involvement in course (doing assignments, attending classes, etc.) was
CLOSE