Skip to main content

Curtis Williams

Title: Clinical Associate Professor

Department: Multidisciplinary Innovation

College: College of Applied and Collaborative Studies

Curriculum Vitae

Curriculum Vitae Link

Education

  • DBA, Walden University, 2017
    Major: Business Administration (Marketing)
    Dissertation: Strategies to Retain Revenue Management Analysts in the U.S. Airline Industry
  • MBA, Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University, 1995
    Major: Aviation
    Dissertation: An Empirical Analysis of Southwest Airline's Ability to Remain the Nation's Most Efficient, Low-Cost, Short-Haul Airline
  • BS, Southern Illinois University, 1993
    Major: Aviation Management

Current Scheduled Teaching

APMG 3120.520Problem AnalysisFall 2025 Syllabus
APMG 4021.530Project Workshop: AdvancedFall 2025 Syllabus
APMG 2011.501Project Workshop: BeginnerFall 2025 Syllabus
Texas Education Code 51.974 (HB 2504) requires each institution of higher education to make available to the public, a syllabus for undergraduate lecture courses offered for credit by the institution.

Previous Scheduled Teaching

APMG 3120.501Problem AnalysisSpring 2025 Syllabus SPOT
APMG 2041.510Project Workshop: BeginnerSpring 2025 Syllabus SPOT
Texas Education Code 51.974 (HB 2504) requires each institution of higher education to make available to the public, a syllabus for undergraduate lecture courses offered for credit by the institution.
,
Overall
Summative Rating		 Challenge and
Engagement Index		 Response Rate

out of 5
out of 7		 %
of
students responded
  • Overall Summative Rating (median):
    This rating represents the combined responses of students to the four global summative items and is presented to provide an overall index of the class’s quality. Overall summative statements include the following (response options include a Likert scale ranging from 5 = Excellent, 3 = Good, and 1= Very poor):
    • The course as a whole was
    • The course content was
    • The instructor’s contribution to the course was
    • The instructor’s effectiveness in teaching the subject matter was
  • Challenge and Engagement Index:
    This rating combines student responses to several SPOT items relating to how academically challenging students found the course to be and how engaged they were. Challenge and Engagement Index items include the following (response options include a Likert scale ranging from 7 = Much higher, 4 = Average, and 1 = Much lower):
    • Do you expect your grade in this course to be
    • The intellectual challenge presented was
    • The amount of effort you put into this course was
    • The amount of effort to succeed in this course was
    • Your involvement in course (doing assignments, attending classes, etc.) was
CLOSE