Skip to main content

Dmitry Anokhin

Title: Instructor

Department: Information Technology and Decision Sciences

College: College of Business

Curriculum Vitae

Curriculum Vitae Link

Education

  • MA, Kent State University, 2016
    Major: Applied Mathematics

Current Scheduled Teaching

DSCI 5180.003Introduction to the Business Decision ProcessSpring 2025
DSCI 5180.006Introduction to the Business Decision ProcessSpring 2025
DSCI 5180.007Introduction to the Business Decision ProcessFall 2024
DSCI 5180.501Introduction to the Business Decision ProcessFall 2024

Previous Scheduled Teaching

DSCI 3710.004Business Statistics with SpreadsheetsSpring 2024 Syllabus SPOT
DSCI 5180.003Introduction to the Business Decision ProcessSpring 2024 SPOT
DSCI 5180.007Introduction to the Business Decision ProcessFall 2023 SPOT
DSCI 5180.501Introduction to the Business Decision ProcessFall 2023 SPOT

Published Intellectual Contributions

    Journal Article

  • Su, J., Anokhin, D., Dehghanian, P., Lejeune, M.A. (2023). On the Use of Mobile Power Sources in Distribution Networks Under Endogenous Uncertainty. IEEE Transactions on Control of Network Systems. https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/10068296
  • Anokhin, S., Bushuev , M., Akerman, E., Spitsin, V., Anokhin, D. (2021). Arbitrage Opportunity Estimation: The Case of the Cobb-Douglas Production Function. International Journal of Operational Research. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJOR.2021.10044099
  • Anokhin, D., Dehghanian, P., Lejeune, M.A., Su, J. (2021). Mobility-As-A-Service for Resilience Delivery in Power Distribution Systems. Production and Operations Management. 30 (8) 2492-2521. https://doi.org/10.1111/poms.13393
,
Overall
Summative Rating
Challenge and
Engagement Index
Response Rate

out of 5

out of 7
%
of
students responded
  • Overall Summative Rating (median):
    This rating represents the combined responses of students to the four global summative items and is presented to provide an overall index of the class’s quality. Overall summative statements include the following (response options include a Likert scale ranging from 5 = Excellent, 3 = Good, and 1= Very poor):
    • The course as a whole was
    • The course content was
    • The instructor’s contribution to the course was
    • The instructor’s effectiveness in teaching the subject matter was
  • Challenge and Engagement Index:
    This rating combines student responses to several SPOT items relating to how academically challenging students found the course to be and how engaged they were. Challenge and Engagement Index items include the following (response options include a Likert scale ranging from 7 = Much higher, 4 = Average, and 1 = Much lower):
    • Do you expect your grade in this course to be
    • The intellectual challenge presented was
    • The amount of effort you put into this course was
    • The amount of effort to succeed in this course was
    • Your involvement in course (doing assignments, attending classes, etc.) was
CLOSE