Skip to main content

Daniel Carrillo-Jara

Title: Assistant Professor

Department: Spanish

College: College of Liberal Arts and Social Sciences

Curriculum Vitae

Curriculum Vitae Link

Education

  • GAC, Purdue University, 2022
    Major: Digital Humanities
  • PhD, Purdue University, 2022
    Major: Languages and Cultures (Spanish)
    Dissertation: Acumulaciones de capital literario: Construcciones del canon en la literature peruana
  • MA, Purdue University, 2019
    Major: Languages and Cultures (Spanish)

Current Scheduled Teaching

SPAN 3002.001Advanced Conversation for Native/Heritage SpeakersSpring 2025 Syllabus
SPAN 3001.001Advanced Conversation for Non Native SpeakersSpring 2025 Syllabus
Texas Education Code 51.974 (HB 2504) requires each institution of higher education to make available to the public, a syllabus for undergraduate lecture courses offered for credit by the institution.

Previous Scheduled Teaching

SPAN 3002.001Advanced Conversation for Native/Heritage SpeakersFall 2024 Syllabus SPOT
SPAN 3001.003Advanced Conversation for Non Native SpeakersFall 2024 Syllabus SPOT
Texas Education Code 51.974 (HB 2504) requires each institution of higher education to make available to the public, a syllabus for undergraduate lecture courses offered for credit by the institution.

Contracts, Grants and Sponsored Research

    Grant - Research

  • Carrillo-Jara, D., "Estímulos Económicos para la difusión de libros y autores peruanos," sponsored by Ministry of Culture (Peru), National, $3000 Funded. (2024).
,
Overall
Summative Rating		 Challenge and
Engagement Index		 Response Rate

out of 5
out of 7		 %
of
students responded
  • Overall Summative Rating (median):
    This rating represents the combined responses of students to the four global summative items and is presented to provide an overall index of the class’s quality. Overall summative statements include the following (response options include a Likert scale ranging from 5 = Excellent, 3 = Good, and 1= Very poor):
    • The course as a whole was
    • The course content was
    • The instructor’s contribution to the course was
    • The instructor’s effectiveness in teaching the subject matter was
  • Challenge and Engagement Index:
    This rating combines student responses to several SPOT items relating to how academically challenging students found the course to be and how engaged they were. Challenge and Engagement Index items include the following (response options include a Likert scale ranging from 7 = Much higher, 4 = Average, and 1 = Much lower):
    • Do you expect your grade in this course to be
    • The intellectual challenge presented was
    • The amount of effort you put into this course was
    • The amount of effort to succeed in this course was
    • Your involvement in course (doing assignments, attending classes, etc.) was
CLOSE