Daniel Herfeldt
- Curry Hall 315
- daniel.herfeldt@unt.edu
- (940) 565-2973 (Office)
Curriculum Vitae
Curriculum Vitae LinkEducation
-
BA, University of North Texas, 2017
Major: Mathematics
Current Scheduled Teaching
No current or future courses scheduled.
Texas Education Code 51.974 (HB 2504) requires each institution of higher education to make available to the public, a syllabus for undergraduate lecture courses offered for credit by the institution.
Previous Scheduled Teaching
| MATH 350.005 | Beginning Algebra | Spring 2025 | Syllabus | |
| MATH 340.001 | Integrated Pre and Beginning Algebra | Spring 2025 | Syllabus | |
| MATH 340.005 | Integrated Pre and Beginning Algebra | Fall 2024 | Syllabus | |
| MATH 340.020 | Integrated Pre and Beginning Algebra | Fall 2024 | Syllabus | |
| MATH 340.021 | Integrated Pre and Beginning Algebra | Fall 2024 | Syllabus | |
| MATH 340.007 | Integrated Pre and Beginning Algebra | Spring 2024 | Syllabus | |
| MATH 340.008 | Integrated Pre and Beginning Algebra | Spring 2024 | Syllabus | |
| MATH 340.005 | Integrated Pre and Beginning Algebra | Fall 2023 | Syllabus | |
| MATH 340.009 | Integrated Pre and Beginning Algebra | Fall 2023 | Syllabus | |
| MATH 340.013 | Integrated Pre and Beginning Algebra | Fall 2023 | Syllabus |
Texas Education Code 51.974 (HB 2504) requires each institution of higher education to make available to the public, a syllabus for undergraduate lecture courses offered for credit by the institution.
| Overall Summative Rating |
Challenge and Engagement Index |
Response Rate |
|---|---|---|
out of 5 |
out of 7 |
% of students responded |
-
Overall Summative Rating (median):
This rating represents the combined responses of students to the four global summative items and is presented to provide an overall index of the class’s quality. Overall summative statements include the following (response options include a Likert scale ranging from 5 = Excellent, 3 = Good, and 1= Very poor):- The course as a whole was
- The course content was
- The instructor’s contribution to the course was
- The instructor’s effectiveness in teaching the subject matter was
-
Challenge and Engagement Index:
This rating combines student responses to several SPOT items relating to how academically challenging students found the course to be and how engaged they were. Challenge and Engagement Index items include the following (response options include a Likert scale ranging from 7 = Much higher, 4 = Average, and 1 = Much lower):- Do you expect your grade in this course to be
- The intellectual challenge presented was
- The amount of effort you put into this course was
- The amount of effort to succeed in this course was
- Your involvement in course (doing assignments, attending classes, etc.) was