Skip to main content

Daniel Johnson

Title: Adjunct Faculty

Department: Public Administration

College: College of Health and Public Service

Curriculum Vitae

Curriculum Vitae Link

Education

  • MPA, University of North Texas, 1982
    Major: Public Administration
  • BA, Austin College, 1977
    Major: Political Science

Current Scheduled Teaching

PADM 5100.501Local Government ManagementSpring 2026
PADM 6710.501Seminar in Public Administration and ManagementSpring 2026
Texas Education Code 51.974 (HB 2504) requires each institution of higher education to make available to the public, a syllabus for undergraduate lecture courses offered for credit by the institution.

Previous Scheduled Teaching

PADM 5100.001Local Government ManagementSpring 2025 SPOT
PADM 6710.007Seminar in Public Administration and ManagementSpring 2025 SPOT
PADM 5100.001Local Government ManagementSpring 2024 SPOT
PADM 6710.009Seminar in Public Administration and ManagementSpring 2024 SPOT
Texas Education Code 51.974 (HB 2504) requires each institution of higher education to make available to the public, a syllabus for undergraduate lecture courses offered for credit by the institution.

Published Intellectual Contributions

    Journal Article

  • Schafer, E.C., Miller, S.E., Lam BPW, Lee, D., Lohrey, M., Eason, A., Nedrud, C., Cairo, K., Olvera, G., Klarmann, R., Brooks, B., Cumiskey, B., Kruse, C., Johnson, D., Laroi, A., Musselman, M. (2025). Impact of Short-Term Hearing Aid Use on Cognitive Performance, Noise Acceptance, and Self-Perceived Benefit.. American Journal of Audiology. 34 (3) 707-721.
  • Exley, T., Johnson, D., Jafari, A. (2023). Utilizing the peltier effect for actuation of thermo-active soft robots. Smart Materials and Structures. IOP Science.
,
Overall
Summative Rating		 Challenge and
Engagement Index		 Response Rate

out of 5
out of 7		 %
of
students responded
  • Overall Summative Rating (median):
    This rating represents the combined responses of students to the four global summative items and is presented to provide an overall index of the class’s quality. Overall summative statements include the following (response options include a Likert scale ranging from 5 = Excellent, 3 = Good, and 1= Very poor):
    • The course as a whole was
    • The course content was
    • The instructor’s contribution to the course was
    • The instructor’s effectiveness in teaching the subject matter was
  • Challenge and Engagement Index:
    This rating combines student responses to several SPOT items relating to how academically challenging students found the course to be and how engaged they were. Challenge and Engagement Index items include the following (response options include a Likert scale ranging from 7 = Much higher, 4 = Average, and 1 = Much lower):
    • Do you expect your grade in this course to be
    • The intellectual challenge presented was
    • The amount of effort you put into this course was
    • The amount of effort to succeed in this course was
    • Your involvement in course (doing assignments, attending classes, etc.) was
CLOSE