Skip to main content

Deama A. Khader

Title: Adjunct Faculty

Department: Information Science

College: College of Information

Curriculum Vitae

Curriculum Vitae Link

Education

  • PhD, University of North Texas, 2025
    Major: Information Science
    Dissertation: The Lasting Impact of Ephemera; Considerations of Art and Proximity in a Conflict Zone
  • BS, University of North Texas, 2018
    Major: Information Science and Applied Technology
    Specialization: Digital Content & Info Systems

Current Scheduled Teaching

INFO 5815.401Topics in Digital Imaging for Information ProfessionalsSpring 2026
INFO 5206.401Information Retrieval DesignFall 2025 Syllabus
INFO 5815.401Topics in Digital Imaging for Information ProfessionalsFall 2025
Texas Education Code 51.974 (HB 2504) requires each institution of higher education to make available to the public, a syllabus for undergraduate lecture courses offered for credit by the institution.

Previous Scheduled Teaching

INFO 5206.401Information Retrieval DesignSummer 5W2 2025
INFO 5815.020Topics in Digital Imaging for Information ProfessionalsFall 2023 SPOT
INFO 5815.001Topics in Digital Imaging for Information ProfessionalsSpring 2023 SPOT
INFO 4206.001Information Retrieval SystemsFall 2022 Syllabus SPOT
INFO 5815.001Topics in Digital Imaging for Information ProfessionalsFall 2022 SPOT
INFO 5815.001Topics in Digital Imaging for Information ProfessionalsSpring 2022 SPOT
INFO 5815.001Topics in Digital Imaging for Information ProfessionalsFall 2021 SPOT
INFO 5815.005Topics in Digital Imaging for Information ProfessionalsFall 2021 SPOT
Texas Education Code 51.974 (HB 2504) requires each institution of higher education to make available to the public, a syllabus for undergraduate lecture courses offered for credit by the institution.
,
Overall
Summative Rating		 Challenge and
Engagement Index		 Response Rate

out of 5
out of 7		 %
of
students responded
  • Overall Summative Rating (median):
    This rating represents the combined responses of students to the four global summative items and is presented to provide an overall index of the class’s quality. Overall summative statements include the following (response options include a Likert scale ranging from 5 = Excellent, 3 = Good, and 1= Very poor):
    • The course as a whole was
    • The course content was
    • The instructor’s contribution to the course was
    • The instructor’s effectiveness in teaching the subject matter was
  • Challenge and Engagement Index:
    This rating combines student responses to several SPOT items relating to how academically challenging students found the course to be and how engaged they were. Challenge and Engagement Index items include the following (response options include a Likert scale ranging from 7 = Much higher, 4 = Average, and 1 = Much lower):
    • Do you expect your grade in this course to be
    • The intellectual challenge presented was
    • The amount of effort you put into this course was
    • The amount of effort to succeed in this course was
    • Your involvement in course (doing assignments, attending classes, etc.) was
CLOSE