Skip to main content

Dan C. Ham

Title: Lecturer

Department: Finance, Insurance, Real Estate and Law

College: College of Business

Curriculum Vitae

Curriculum Vitae Link

Education

  • MBA, University of California, Irvine, 1994
    Major: Business Administration
    Specialization: Finance and Marketing
  • BA, University of California, Irvine, 1988
    Major: Economics

Current Scheduled Teaching

No current or future courses scheduled.

Texas Education Code 51.974 (HB 2504) requires each institution of higher education to make available to the public, a syllabus for undergraduate lecture courses offered for credit by the institution.

Previous Scheduled Teaching

FINA 3770.004FinanceSummer 5W2 2023 Syllabus
FINA 4300.001Financial Statement Analysis and Liquidity ManagementSummer 5W2 2023 Syllabus
FINA 5170.501Financial ManagementSpring 2023 SPOT
FINA 4300.001Financial Statement Analysis and Liquidity ManagementSpring 2023 Syllabus SPOT
FINA 4300.002Financial Statement Analysis and Liquidity ManagementSpring 2023 Syllabus SPOT
FINA 4500.003International FinanceSpring 2023 Syllabus SPOT
FINA 3770.010FinanceFall 2022 Syllabus SPOT
FINA 4300.001Financial Statement Analysis and Liquidity ManagementFall 2022 Syllabus SPOT
FINA 4300.002Financial Statement Analysis and Liquidity ManagementFall 2022 Syllabus SPOT
FINA 4500.001International FinanceFall 2022 Syllabus SPOT
FINA 4300.001Financial Statement Analysis and Liquidity ManagementSummer 5W2 2022 Syllabus SPOT
FINA 3770.004FinanceSpring 2022 Syllabus SPOT
FINA 5170.501Financial ManagementSpring 2022 SPOT
Texas Education Code 51.974 (HB 2504) requires each institution of higher education to make available to the public, a syllabus for undergraduate lecture courses offered for credit by the institution.
,
Overall
Summative Rating		 Challenge and
Engagement Index		 Response Rate

out of 5
out of 7		 %
of
students responded
  • Overall Summative Rating (median):
    This rating represents the combined responses of students to the four global summative items and is presented to provide an overall index of the class’s quality. Overall summative statements include the following (response options include a Likert scale ranging from 5 = Excellent, 3 = Good, and 1= Very poor):
    • The course as a whole was
    • The course content was
    • The instructor’s contribution to the course was
    • The instructor’s effectiveness in teaching the subject matter was
  • Challenge and Engagement Index:
    This rating combines student responses to several SPOT items relating to how academically challenging students found the course to be and how engaged they were. Challenge and Engagement Index items include the following (response options include a Likert scale ranging from 7 = Much higher, 4 = Average, and 1 = Much lower):
    • Do you expect your grade in this course to be
    • The intellectual challenge presented was
    • The amount of effort you put into this course was
    • The amount of effort to succeed in this course was
    • Your involvement in course (doing assignments, attending classes, etc.) was
CLOSE