Skip to main content

Diamond Beverly-Porter

Title: Adjunct Faculty

Department: IADS - Interdisciplinary Art and Design Studies

College: College of Visual Arts and Design

Curriculum Vitae

Curriculum Vitae Link

Education

  • MFA, University of Texas at Dallas, 2022
    Major: Art, Technology, and Emerging Communication

Current Scheduled Teaching

No current or future courses scheduled.

Texas Education Code 51.974 (HB 2504) requires each institution of higher education to make available to the public, a syllabus for undergraduate lecture courses offered for credit by the institution.

Previous Scheduled Teaching

ART 3030.020Digital Communication for Art and Creative EntrepreneurshipSummer 5W2 2023 Syllabus
ART 2020.001Digital Tools and Technologies for Creative PracticeSummer 5W1 2023 Syllabus
ART 3030.021Digital Communication for Art and Creative EntrepreneurshipSpring 2023 Syllabus SPOT
ART 3030.022Digital Communication for Art and Creative EntrepreneurshipSpring 2023 Syllabus SPOT
ART 3030.023Digital Communication for Art and Creative EntrepreneurshipSpring 2023 Syllabus SPOT
ART 3030.021Digital Communication for Art and Creative EntrepreneurshipFall 2022 Syllabus SPOT
ART 3030.022Digital Communication for Art and Creative EntrepreneurshipFall 2022 Syllabus SPOT
ART 2020.005Digital Tools and Technologies for Creative PracticeFall 2022 Syllabus SPOT
Texas Education Code 51.974 (HB 2504) requires each institution of higher education to make available to the public, a syllabus for undergraduate lecture courses offered for credit by the institution.
,
Overall
Summative Rating		 Challenge and
Engagement Index		 Response Rate

out of 5
out of 7		 %
of
students responded
  • Overall Summative Rating (median):
    This rating represents the combined responses of students to the four global summative items and is presented to provide an overall index of the class’s quality. Overall summative statements include the following (response options include a Likert scale ranging from 5 = Excellent, 3 = Good, and 1= Very poor):
    • The course as a whole was
    • The course content was
    • The instructor’s contribution to the course was
    • The instructor’s effectiveness in teaching the subject matter was
  • Challenge and Engagement Index:
    This rating combines student responses to several SPOT items relating to how academically challenging students found the course to be and how engaged they were. Challenge and Engagement Index items include the following (response options include a Likert scale ranging from 7 = Much higher, 4 = Average, and 1 = Much lower):
    • Do you expect your grade in this course to be
    • The intellectual challenge presented was
    • The amount of effort you put into this course was
    • The amount of effort to succeed in this course was
    • Your involvement in course (doing assignments, attending classes, etc.) was
CLOSE