Skip to main content

Dev Mukherjee

Title: Clinical Assistant Professor

Department: Multidisciplinary Innovation

College: College of Applied and Collaborative Studies

Curriculum Vitae

Curriculum Vitae Link

Education

  • PhD, University of North Texas, 2003
    Major: Information Science
    Dissertation: An Empirical Investigation of Critical Factors That Influence Data Warehouse Implementation
  • MBA, University of North Texas, 1995
    Major: Business Computer Information Systems
  • MBA, University of North Texas, 1991
    Major: Finance

Current Scheduled Teaching

APMG 4120.501CapstoneSpring 2026
ADAR 2020.501Data Design, Analysis and RepresentationSpring 2026
CACS 2010.510Applied Project ManagementFall 2025 Syllabus
ADAR 2020.520Data Design, Analysis and RepresentationFall 2025 Syllabus
APMG 3220.501Project Management IIFall 2025 Syllabus
Texas Education Code 51.974 (HB 2504) requires each institution of higher education to make available to the public, a syllabus for undergraduate lecture courses offered for credit by the institution.

Previous Scheduled Teaching

APMG 4120.501CapstoneSpring 2025 Syllabus SPOT
ADAR 2020.501Data Design, Analysis and RepresentationSpring 2025 Syllabus SPOT
APMG 3220.520Project Management IISpring 2025 Syllabus SPOT
CACS 2010.510Applied Project ManagementFall 2024 Syllabus SPOT
ADAR 3020.501Inferential AnalysisFall 2024 Syllabus SPOT
Texas Education Code 51.974 (HB 2504) requires each institution of higher education to make available to the public, a syllabus for undergraduate lecture courses offered for credit by the institution.
,
Overall
Summative Rating		 Challenge and
Engagement Index		 Response Rate

out of 5
out of 7		 %
of
students responded
  • Overall Summative Rating (median):
    This rating represents the combined responses of students to the four global summative items and is presented to provide an overall index of the class’s quality. Overall summative statements include the following (response options include a Likert scale ranging from 5 = Excellent, 3 = Good, and 1= Very poor):
    • The course as a whole was
    • The course content was
    • The instructor’s contribution to the course was
    • The instructor’s effectiveness in teaching the subject matter was
  • Challenge and Engagement Index:
    This rating combines student responses to several SPOT items relating to how academically challenging students found the course to be and how engaged they were. Challenge and Engagement Index items include the following (response options include a Likert scale ranging from 7 = Much higher, 4 = Average, and 1 = Much lower):
    • Do you expect your grade in this course to be
    • The intellectual challenge presented was
    • The amount of effort you put into this course was
    • The amount of effort to succeed in this course was
    • Your involvement in course (doing assignments, attending classes, etc.) was
CLOSE