Skip to main content

Dina Yousef

Title: Clinical Assistant Professor

Department: Counseling and Higher Education

College: College of Education

Curriculum Vitae

Curriculum Vitae Link

Education

  • PhD, University of North Texas, 2015
    Major: Counselor Education
  • MEd, University of North Texas, 2011
    Major: Counseling
  • BA, University of North Texas, 2009
    Major: Psychology

Current Scheduled Teaching

COUN 5000.001Filial/Family TherapyFall 2024
COUN 5690.001Practicum in CounselingFall 2024

Previous Scheduled Teaching

COUN 5720.700Internship in Counseling IFall 2017 SPOT
COUN 5721.700Internship in Counseling IIFall 2017 SPOT
COUN 5690.002Practicum in CounselingFall 2016 SPOT
COUN 5720.701Internship in Counseling ISummer SUM 2016 SPOT
COUN 5721.701Internship in Counseling IISummer SUM 2016 SPOT
COUN 5900.002Special ProblemsSummer SUM 2016
COUN 3600.001Therapeutic PlaySpring 2015 Syllabus
COUN 2610.001PRIN COUNSELING IFall 2014 Syllabus
COUN 3600.002Therapeutic PlaySpring 2014 Syllabus
COUN 3620.001Principles of Counseling IIFall 2013 Syllabus

Published Intellectual Contributions

    Journal Article

  • Lindo, N.A., Meany-Walen, K., Ohrt, J.H., Prosek, E.A., Yousef, D., Yaites, L.D., Ener, L. (2015). Wellness and burnout prevention: Perceptions of a group supervision intervention.. Journal of Professional Counseling: Practice, Theory, & Research. 42 28-42.
  • Meany-Walen, K., Lindo, N.A., Opiola, K., Chung, C., Chen, S., Cheng, Y., Yousef, D., Turley Stich, E. (2014). Therapeutic play: Undergraduate students’ perceptions of the process and outcome of supervised play-based training.. International Journal of Humanities and Social Sciences. 4 (14) 45-51.
,
Overall
Summative Rating
Challenge and
Engagement Index
Response Rate

out of 5

out of 7
%
of
students responded
  • Overall Summative Rating (median):
    This rating represents the combined responses of students to the four global summative items and is presented to provide an overall index of the class’s quality. Overall summative statements include the following (response options include a Likert scale ranging from 5 = Excellent, 3 = Good, and 1= Very poor):
    • The course as a whole was
    • The course content was
    • The instructor’s contribution to the course was
    • The instructor’s effectiveness in teaching the subject matter was
  • Challenge and Engagement Index:
    This rating combines student responses to several SPOT items relating to how academically challenging students found the course to be and how engaged they were. Challenge and Engagement Index items include the following (response options include a Likert scale ranging from 7 = Much higher, 4 = Average, and 1 = Much lower):
    • Do you expect your grade in this course to be
    • The intellectual challenge presented was
    • The amount of effort you put into this course was
    • The amount of effort to succeed in this course was
    • Your involvement in course (doing assignments, attending classes, etc.) was
CLOSE