Faculty Profile

Donguk Lee

Title
Assistant Professor
Department
Audiology and Speech-Language Pathology
College
College of Health and Public Service

    

Education

PhD, University of Tennessee Health Science Center, 2023.
Major: Speech and Hearing Science

Current Scheduled Teaching*

No current or future courses scheduled.

* Texas Education Code 51.974 (HB 2504) requires each institution of higher education to make available to the public, a syllabus for undergraduate lecture courses offered for credit by the institution.

Previous Scheduled Teaching*

ASLP 6750.001, Advanced Audiologic Assessment, Spring 2024 Syllabus SPOT
ASLP 6670.002, Medical Audiology, Spring 2024 Syllabus SPOT
ASLP 6695.001, Hearing Aids II: Strategies for Selecting and Fitting Hearing Aids, Fall 2023 Syllabus SPOT

* Texas Education Code 51.974 (HB 2504) requires each institution of higher education to make available to the public, a syllabus for undergraduate lecture courses offered for credit by the institution.

Published Publications

Published Intellectual Contributions

Journal Article
Lee, D., Lewis, J. D. (2023). Inter-subject variability in the dependence of medial-olivocochlear reflex strength on noise bandwidth. Ear and Hearing. 44(3), 544-557.
Lewis, J. D., Goettl-Meyer, M., Lee, D. (2023). Medial Olivocochlear Reflex Strength in Ears With Low-to-Moderate Annual Noise Exposure. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research. 66(4), 1428-1443.
Lee, D., Lewis, J. D., Johnstone, P. M., Plyler, P. N. (2022). Acceptable noise levels and preferred signal-to-noise ratios for speech and music. Ear and Hearing. 43(3), 1013-1022.
Lewis, J. D., Mashburn, A., Lee, D. (2020). Jittering stimulus onset attenuates short-latency, synchronized-spontaneous otoacoustic emission energy. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America. 147(3), 1504-1515.
Lee, D., Han, W. (2019). Noise levels at baseball stadiums and the spectators’ attitude to noise. Journal of Noise and Health. 21(99), 47-54.
Lee, D., Kim, G., Han, W. (2017). Analysis of Subway Interior Noise at Peak Commuter Time. Journal of Audiology & Otology. 21(2), 61-65.
Yu, J., Lee, D., Han, W. (2016). Preferred listening levels of mobile phone programs when considering subway interior noise. 18(80), 36-41.

Awarded Grants

Contracts, Grants and Sponsored Research

Grant - Research
Gopal, K. V. (Principal), Lee, D. (Co-Principal), Thomas, B. (Co-Principal), "Assessing the Relationship Between Hearing Loss, Hearing Aid Intervention, Brain Imaging, and Cognitive Decline," Sponsored by Once Upon a Time Foundation, Other, $20000 Funded. (April 1, 2024March 31, 2025).
Lee, D. (Principal), Schafer, E. C. (Co-Principal), Miller, S. E. (Co-Principal), Lam, P. (Co-Principal), "Noise tolerance and preferred listening level under different noise conditions," Sponsored by Texas Speech-Language-Hearing Foundation Research Grants, State, $1100 Funded. (February 1, 2024January 31, 2025).
Lee, D. (Principal), Lewis, J. D. (Co-Principal), "Evaluation of Efferent Unmasking Using Cortical-Auditory Evoked Potentials," Sponsored by American Speech-Language Hearing Association (ASHA), National, $2000 Funded. (December 1, 2022December 31, 2023).
,
Overall
Summative Rating
Challenge and
Engagement Index
Response Rate

out of 5

out of 7
%
of
students responded
  • Overall Summative Rating (median):
    This rating represents the combined responses of students to the four global summative items and is presented to provide an overall index of the class’s quality. Overall summative statements include the following (response options include a Likert scale ranging from 5 = Excellent, 3 = Good, and 1= Very poor):
    • The course as a whole was
    • The course content was
    • The instructor’s contribution to the course was
    • The instructor’s effectiveness in teaching the subject matter was
  • Challenge and Engagement Index:
    This rating combines student responses to several SPOT items relating to how academically challenging students found the course to be and how engaged they were. Challenge and Engagement Index items include the following (response options include a Likert scale ranging from 7 = Much higher, 4 = Average, and 1 = Much lower):
    • Do you expect your grade in this course to be
    • The intellectual challenge presented was
    • The amount of effort you put into this course was
    • The amount of effort to succeed in this course was
    • Your involvement in course (doing assignments, attending classes, etc.) was
CLOSE