Skip to main content

Dianna Lacy

Title: Adjunct Faculty

Department: Teacher Education and Administration

College: College of Education

Curriculum Vitae

Curriculum Vitae Link

Education

  • GAC, University of North Texas, 2006
    Major: Professional Service Principal
  • MEd, University of North Texas, 2003
    Major: Educational Administration
  • BS, Texas Woman's University, 1991
    Major: Not Listed

Current Scheduled Teaching

EDRE 3350.501Early Language and Literacy DevelopmentSpring 2025 Syllabus
EDEE 5115.037Internship IISpring 2025
EDCI 4108.760Student Teaching in the Secondary SchoolSpring 2025 Syllabus
EDCI 4118.760Student Teaching in the Secondary SchoolSpring 2025 Syllabus
Texas Education Code 51.974 (HB 2504) requires each institution of higher education to make available to the public, a syllabus for undergraduate lecture courses offered for credit by the institution.

Previous Scheduled Teaching

EDEE 4101.764Clinical TeachingFall 2024 Syllabus SPOT
EDEE 4102.764Clinical TeachingFall 2024 Syllabus SPOT
EDEE 5101.760Student Teaching in EC through Grade 6Fall 2024
EDEE 5102.752Student Teaching in EC through Grade 6Fall 2024
Texas Education Code 51.974 (HB 2504) requires each institution of higher education to make available to the public, a syllabus for undergraduate lecture courses offered for credit by the institution.
,
Overall
Summative Rating		 Challenge and
Engagement Index		 Response Rate

out of 5
out of 7		 %
of
students responded
  • Overall Summative Rating (median):
    This rating represents the combined responses of students to the four global summative items and is presented to provide an overall index of the class’s quality. Overall summative statements include the following (response options include a Likert scale ranging from 5 = Excellent, 3 = Good, and 1= Very poor):
    • The course as a whole was
    • The course content was
    • The instructor’s contribution to the course was
    • The instructor’s effectiveness in teaching the subject matter was
  • Challenge and Engagement Index:
    This rating combines student responses to several SPOT items relating to how academically challenging students found the course to be and how engaged they were. Challenge and Engagement Index items include the following (response options include a Likert scale ranging from 7 = Much higher, 4 = Average, and 1 = Much lower):
    • Do you expect your grade in this course to be
    • The intellectual challenge presented was
    • The amount of effort you put into this course was
    • The amount of effort to succeed in this course was
    • Your involvement in course (doing assignments, attending classes, etc.) was
CLOSE