Skip to main content

David Lambert

Title: Teaching Fellow

Department: Mathematics

College: College of Science

Curriculum Vitae

Curriculum Vitae Link

Education

  • PhD, University of North Texas, 2022
    Major: Physics
    Dissertation: Scaling, Power-Law First Return Times, and Non-Ergodicity

Current Scheduled Teaching

No current or future courses scheduled.

Texas Education Code 51.974 (HB 2504) requires each institution of higher education to make available to the public, a syllabus for undergraduate lecture courses offered for credit by the institution.

Previous Scheduled Teaching

MATH 2730.007Multivariable CalculusSpring 2023 Syllabus SPOT
MATH 1180.310College Math for Business, Economics and Related FieldsFall 2022 Syllabus SPOT
UGMT 1300.311Tutorial Option C in Developmental MathematicsFall 2022 Syllabus
UGMT 1300.312Tutorial Option C in Developmental MathematicsFall 2022 Syllabus
MATH 1780.002Probability ModelsSpring 2021 Syllabus SPOT
MATH 1190.005Business CalculusFall 2020 Syllabus SPOT
Texas Education Code 51.974 (HB 2504) requires each institution of higher education to make available to the public, a syllabus for undergraduate lecture courses offered for credit by the institution.

Published Intellectual Contributions

    Journal Article

  • Allaart, P.C., Jackson, S.C., Jones, R.T., Lambert, D. (2023). On the existence of numbers with matching continued fraction and decimal expansions. Monatshefte für Mathematik. 202 (1) 1-30.
  • Baxley, J.D., Lambert, D.R., Bologna, M., West, B.J., Grigolini, P. (2023). Unveiling pseudo-crucial events in noise-induced phase transitions. Chaos, Solitons & Fractals. 172 (113580) 113580. Colorado, Elsevier. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chaos.2023.113580
,
Overall
Summative Rating		 Challenge and
Engagement Index		 Response Rate

out of 5
out of 7		 %
of
students responded
  • Overall Summative Rating (median):
    This rating represents the combined responses of students to the four global summative items and is presented to provide an overall index of the class’s quality. Overall summative statements include the following (response options include a Likert scale ranging from 5 = Excellent, 3 = Good, and 1= Very poor):
    • The course as a whole was
    • The course content was
    • The instructor’s contribution to the course was
    • The instructor’s effectiveness in teaching the subject matter was
  • Challenge and Engagement Index:
    This rating combines student responses to several SPOT items relating to how academically challenging students found the course to be and how engaged they were. Challenge and Engagement Index items include the following (response options include a Likert scale ranging from 7 = Much higher, 4 = Average, and 1 = Much lower):
    • Do you expect your grade in this course to be
    • The intellectual challenge presented was
    • The amount of effort you put into this course was
    • The amount of effort to succeed in this course was
    • Your involvement in course (doing assignments, attending classes, etc.) was
CLOSE