Skip to main content

Elizabeth Krajewski

Title: Assistant Professor

Department: Audiology and Speech-Language Pathology

College: College of Public Affairs and Health Sciences

Curriculum Vitae

Curriculum Vitae Link

Education

  • PhD, Pennsylvania State University, 2025
    Major: Communication Sciences and Disorders
  • MS, Pennsylvania State University, 2019
    Major: Communication Sciences and Disorders

Current Scheduled Teaching

No current or future courses scheduled.

Texas Education Code 51.974 (HB 2504) requires each institution of higher education to make available to the public, a syllabus for undergraduate lecture courses offered for credit by the institution.

Previous Scheduled Teaching

ASLP 5755.002Neuromotor Speech DisordersSpring 2026
ASLP 4035.100Speech Sound DisordersSpring 2026 Syllabus
ASLP 4035.400Speech Sound DisordersFall 2025 Syllabus SPOT
Texas Education Code 51.974 (HB 2504) requires each institution of higher education to make available to the public, a syllabus for undergraduate lecture courses offered for credit by the institution.

Published Intellectual Contributions

    Journal Article

  • Krajewski, E., Lee, J., Viswanathan, N., Olmstead, A., Simmons, Z. (2024). The Effects of Interactive Context on Acoustic Characteristics of Speech in People With Dysarthria: A Preliminary Study. American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology. 33 (4) 1952-1964. American Speech Language Hearing Association. https://doi.org/10.1044/2024_ajslp-23-00372
  • Lee, J., Madhavan, A., Krajewski, E., Lingenfelter, S. (2021). Assessment of dysarthria and dysphagia in patients with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis: Review of the current evidence. Other. 64 (5) 520-531. Wiley. https://doi.org/10.1002/mus.27361
,
Overall
Summative Rating		 Challenge and
Engagement Index		 Response Rate

out of 5
out of 7		 %
of
students responded
  • Overall Summative Rating (median):
    This rating represents the combined responses of students to the four global summative items and is presented to provide an overall index of the class’s quality. Overall summative statements include the following (response options include a Likert scale ranging from 5 = Excellent, 3 = Good, and 1= Very poor):
    • The course as a whole was
    • The course content was
    • The instructor’s contribution to the course was
    • The instructor’s effectiveness in teaching the subject matter was
  • Challenge and Engagement Index:
    This rating combines student responses to several SPOT items relating to how academically challenging students found the course to be and how engaged they were. Challenge and Engagement Index items include the following (response options include a Likert scale ranging from 7 = Much higher, 4 = Average, and 1 = Much lower):
    • Do you expect your grade in this course to be
    • The intellectual challenge presented was
    • The amount of effort you put into this course was
    • The amount of effort to succeed in this course was
    • Your involvement in course (doing assignments, attending classes, etc.) was
CLOSE