Skip to main content

Ermir Bejo

Title: Adjunct Faculty

Department: Composition Studies

College: College of Music

Curriculum Vitae

Curriculum Vitae Link

Education

  • PhD, University of North Texas, 2017
    Major: Music - Composition
    Dissertation: Postmodern Multiplicities in Three Original Works

Current Scheduled Teaching

No current or future courses scheduled.

Texas Education Code 51.974 (HB 2504) requires each institution of higher education to make available to the public, a syllabus for undergraduate lecture courses offered for credit by the institution.

Previous Scheduled Teaching

MUAC 1540.702Private Lessons (Concentration) in ElectronicsSpring 2024 SPOT
MUAC 1540.701Private Lessons (Concentration) in ElectronicsFall 2023 Syllabus SPOT
MUAC 1540.001Private Lessons (Concentration) in ElectronicsSpring 2023 Syllabus SPOT
MUAC 1540.700Private Lessons (Concentration) in ElectronicsFall 2022 Syllabus SPOT
MUAG 5900.711SPECIAL PROBLEMSSpring 2022
MUGC 4890.007Studies in MusicSpring 2022 Syllabus SPOT
MUGC 5890.007Studies in MusicSpring 2022 SPOT
MUCP 1190.001Beginning Composition IISpring 2017 Syllabus SPOT
MUCP 3090.001Class Composition IISpring 2017 Syllabus SPOT
MUCP 4310.001InstrumentationFall 2016
MUCP 2190.700Intermediate Composition IISpring 2016 SPOT
MUCP 2080.700Secondary Composition ISpring 2016 SPOT
MUCP 2180.700Intermediate Composition IFall 2015 SPOT
MUCP 2190.700Intermediate Composition IIFall 2015 SPOT
MUCP 2080.700Secondary Composition IFall 2015 SPOT
Texas Education Code 51.974 (HB 2504) requires each institution of higher education to make available to the public, a syllabus for undergraduate lecture courses offered for credit by the institution.
,
Overall
Summative Rating		 Challenge and
Engagement Index		 Response Rate

out of 5
out of 7		 %
of
students responded
  • Overall Summative Rating (median):
    This rating represents the combined responses of students to the four global summative items and is presented to provide an overall index of the class’s quality. Overall summative statements include the following (response options include a Likert scale ranging from 5 = Excellent, 3 = Good, and 1= Very poor):
    • The course as a whole was
    • The course content was
    • The instructor’s contribution to the course was
    • The instructor’s effectiveness in teaching the subject matter was
  • Challenge and Engagement Index:
    This rating combines student responses to several SPOT items relating to how academically challenging students found the course to be and how engaged they were. Challenge and Engagement Index items include the following (response options include a Likert scale ranging from 7 = Much higher, 4 = Average, and 1 = Much lower):
    • Do you expect your grade in this course to be
    • The intellectual challenge presented was
    • The amount of effort you put into this course was
    • The amount of effort to succeed in this course was
    • Your involvement in course (doing assignments, attending classes, etc.) was
CLOSE