Skip to main content

Eunho Cha

Title: Research Assistant Professor

Department: Materials Science and Engineering

College: College of Engineering

Curriculum Vitae

Curriculum Vitae Link

Education

  • PhD, University of North Texas, 2019
    Major: Materials Science and Engineering
    Dissertation: Carbon Nanotubes and Molybdenum Disulfide Protected Electrodes for High Performance Lithium-Sulfur Battery

Current Scheduled Teaching

No current or future courses scheduled.

Texas Education Code 51.974 (HB 2504) requires each institution of higher education to make available to the public, a syllabus for undergraduate lecture courses offered for credit by the institution.

Previous Scheduled Teaching

MTSE 3070.008Electrical, Optical, and Magnetic Properties of MaterialsSpring 2025 Syllabus SPOT
Texas Education Code 51.974 (HB 2504) requires each institution of higher education to make available to the public, a syllabus for undergraduate lecture courses offered for credit by the institution.

Published Intellectual Contributions

    Book Chapter

  • Cha, E., Pathak, A.D., Choi, W. (2024). Lithium–Sulfur Batteries: From Lab to Industry and Safety. Engineering Materials. 675-696. Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-66226-3_34

    • Critical Review

  • Cha, E. (2024). Towards the commercialization of Li-S battery: From lab to industry.
  • Cha, E. (2022). Polysulfide regulation vs anode modification: Perspectives on commercializing lithium–sulfur batteries.

    • Journal Article

  • Jung, J.Y., Yu, S., Kim, H., Cha, E., Shin, G.S., Eo, S.B., Moon, S.Y., Lee, M.W., Kucher, M., Böhm, R., Hwang, J.Y. (2025). Process-structure–property study of 3D-printed continuous fiber reinforced composites. Composites Part A: Applied Science and Manufacturing. 188 108538. Elsevier BV. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compositesa.2024.108538
  • Zou, S.J., Patel, M.D., Smith, L.M., Cha, E., Shi, S.Q., Choi, W. (2024). Pecan Shell-Derived Activated Carbon for High-Electrochemical Performance Supercapacitor Electrode. Materials. 17 (13) 3091. MDPI.
  • Cha, E. (2024). Pecan Shell-Derived Activated Carbon for High-Electrochemical Performance Supercapacitor Electrode.
  • Cha, E. (2022). Reaction-sintered LAGP solid electrolytes with MoS2 coating for improved stability with Li metal. Ceramic International.
  • Cha, E., Yun, J.H., Ponraj, R., Kim, D.K. (2021). A mechanistic review of lithiophilic materials: resolving lithium dendrites and advancing lithium metal-based batteries. Other. 5 (17) 6294-6314. Royal Society of Chemistry (RSC). https://doi.org/10.1039/d1qm00579k
  • Cha, E., Patel, M.D., Park, J., Hwang, J., Prasad, V., Cho, K., Choi, W. (2018). 2D MoS2 as an efficient protective layer for lithium metal anodes in high-performance Li–S batteries. Nature Nanotechnology. 13 (4) 337-344. Springer Science and Business Media LLC. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41565-018-0061-y

Contracts, Grants and Sponsored Research

    Grant - Research

  • Cha, E. (Principal), "Young Scientist Research Grant," sponsored by National Research Council of Science & Technology (NST), International, $150000 Funded. (2023 - 2024).
,
Overall
Summative Rating		 Challenge and
Engagement Index		 Response Rate

out of 5
out of 7		 %
of
students responded
  • Overall Summative Rating (median):
    This rating represents the combined responses of students to the four global summative items and is presented to provide an overall index of the class’s quality. Overall summative statements include the following (response options include a Likert scale ranging from 5 = Excellent, 3 = Good, and 1= Very poor):
    • The course as a whole was
    • The course content was
    • The instructor’s contribution to the course was
    • The instructor’s effectiveness in teaching the subject matter was
  • Challenge and Engagement Index:
    This rating combines student responses to several SPOT items relating to how academically challenging students found the course to be and how engaged they were. Challenge and Engagement Index items include the following (response options include a Likert scale ranging from 7 = Much higher, 4 = Average, and 1 = Much lower):
    • Do you expect your grade in this course to be
    • The intellectual challenge presented was
    • The amount of effort you put into this course was
    • The amount of effort to succeed in this course was
    • Your involvement in course (doing assignments, attending classes, etc.) was
CLOSE