Skip to main content

Elizabeth C. Moore

Title: Lecturer

Department: Teacher Education and Administration

College: College of Education

Curriculum Vitae

Curriculum Vitae Link

Education

  • MEd, Marquette University, 2018
    Major: Educational Policy and Leadership
    Specialization: Secondary Education

Current Scheduled Teaching

EDRE 4850.023Teaching the Tools and Practices of Reading Across the CurriculumFall 2024 Syllabus

Previous Scheduled Teaching

EDRE 3350.006Early Language and Literacy DevelopmentSpring 2024 Syllabus SPOT
EDRE 3350.009Early Language and Literacy DevelopmentSpring 2024 Syllabus SPOT
EDRE 3350.501Early Language and Literacy DevelopmentSpring 2024 Syllabus SPOT
EDRE 4850.019Teaching the Tools and Practices of Reading Across the CurriculumSpring 2024 Syllabus SPOT
EDRE 4850.002Teaching the Tools and Practices of Reading Across the CurriculumFall 2023 Syllabus SPOT
EDRE 4850.007Teaching the Tools and Practices of Reading Across the CurriculumFall 2023 Syllabus SPOT
EDRE 4850.017Teaching the Tools and Practices of Reading Across the CurriculumFall 2023 Syllabus SPOT
EDRE 4860.501Teaching the Tools and Practices of Writing across the CurriculumFall 2023 Syllabus SPOT
EDCI 3800.005Professional Issues in TeachingSpring 2023 Syllabus SPOT
EDCI 3800.006Professional Issues in TeachingFall 2022 Syllabus SPOT
EDCI 4060.030Content Area ReadingSummer 10W 2022 Syllabus SPOT
EDCI 3800.001Professional Issues in TeachingSpring 2022 Syllabus SPOT
EDEE 1010.003Teaching as Advocacy for EquitySpring 2022 Syllabus SPOT
EDCI 3800.005Professional Issues in TeachingFall 2021 Syllabus SPOT
EDRE 4860.502Reading and the Language Arts in Grades EC 8Spring 2021 Syllabus SPOT
,
Overall
Summative Rating
Challenge and
Engagement Index
Response Rate

out of 5

out of 7
%
of
students responded
  • Overall Summative Rating (median):
    This rating represents the combined responses of students to the four global summative items and is presented to provide an overall index of the class’s quality. Overall summative statements include the following (response options include a Likert scale ranging from 5 = Excellent, 3 = Good, and 1= Very poor):
    • The course as a whole was
    • The course content was
    • The instructor’s contribution to the course was
    • The instructor’s effectiveness in teaching the subject matter was
  • Challenge and Engagement Index:
    This rating combines student responses to several SPOT items relating to how academically challenging students found the course to be and how engaged they were. Challenge and Engagement Index items include the following (response options include a Likert scale ranging from 7 = Much higher, 4 = Average, and 1 = Much lower):
    • Do you expect your grade in this course to be
    • The intellectual challenge presented was
    • The amount of effort you put into this course was
    • The amount of effort to succeed in this course was
    • Your involvement in course (doing assignments, attending classes, etc.) was
CLOSE