Skip to main content

Elizabeth Joseph

Title: Visiting Lecturer

Department: Psychology

College: College of Liberal Arts and Social Sciences

Curriculum Vitae

Curriculum Vitae Link

Education

  • PhD, Texas Christian University, 2023
    Major: Experimental Psychology
  • MS, Texas Christian University, 2021
    Major: Experimental Psychology

Current Scheduled Teaching

PSYC 1650.005Biological PsychologyFall 2024 Syllabus
PSYC 1630.001General Psychology IFall 2024 Syllabus
PSYC 1630.003General Psychology IFall 2024 Syllabus
PSYC 1630.006General Psychology IFall 2024 Syllabus
Texas Education Code 51.974 (HB 2504) requires each institution of higher education to make available to the public, a syllabus for undergraduate lecture courses offered for credit by the institution.

Previous Scheduled Teaching

PSYC 3000.901Positive PsychologySummer 5W2 2024 Syllabus SPOT
PSYC 1650.002Biological PsychologySpring 2024 Syllabus SPOT
PSYC 3620.002Developmental PsychologySpring 2024 Syllabus SPOT
PSYC 1630.001General Psychology ISpring 2024 Syllabus SPOT
PSYC 4820.004Sensation and PerceptionSpring 2024 Syllabus SPOT
PSYC 1650.005Biological PsychologyFall 2023 Syllabus SPOT
PSYC 4600.001History and SystemsFall 2023 Syllabus SPOT
PSYC 4820.002Sensation and PerceptionFall 2023 Syllabus SPOT
Texas Education Code 51.974 (HB 2504) requires each institution of higher education to make available to the public, a syllabus for undergraduate lecture courses offered for credit by the institution.
,
Overall
Summative Rating		 Challenge and
Engagement Index		 Response Rate

out of 5
out of 7		 %
of
students responded
  • Overall Summative Rating (median):
    This rating represents the combined responses of students to the four global summative items and is presented to provide an overall index of the class’s quality. Overall summative statements include the following (response options include a Likert scale ranging from 5 = Excellent, 3 = Good, and 1= Very poor):
    • The course as a whole was
    • The course content was
    • The instructor’s contribution to the course was
    • The instructor’s effectiveness in teaching the subject matter was
  • Challenge and Engagement Index:
    This rating combines student responses to several SPOT items relating to how academically challenging students found the course to be and how engaged they were. Challenge and Engagement Index items include the following (response options include a Likert scale ranging from 7 = Much higher, 4 = Average, and 1 = Much lower):
    • Do you expect your grade in this course to be
    • The intellectual challenge presented was
    • The amount of effort you put into this course was
    • The amount of effort to succeed in this course was
    • Your involvement in course (doing assignments, attending classes, etc.) was
CLOSE