Skip to main content

Erica L. Holeman

Title: Assistant Professor

Department: Design

College: College of Visual Arts and Design

Curriculum Vitae

Curriculum Vitae Link

Education

  • MFA, Maryland Institute College of Art, 2017
    Major: Graphic Design

Current Scheduled Teaching

ADES 3545.504Communication Design StudioSpring 2025
ADES 2510.502Typography IISpring 2025
ADES 3510.502Interaction Design IFall 2024 Syllabus
ADES 1510.501Typography IFall 2024 Syllabus
Texas Education Code 51.974 (HB 2504) requires each institution of higher education to make available to the public, a syllabus for undergraduate lecture courses offered for credit by the institution.

Previous Scheduled Teaching

ADES 3545.504Communication Design StudioSpring 2024 Syllabus SPOT
ADES 2510.502Typography IISpring 2024 Syllabus SPOT
ADES 3510.502Interaction Design IFall 2023 Syllabus SPOT
ADES 1510.501Typography IFall 2023 Syllabus SPOT
ADES 3545.504Communication Design StudioSpring 2023 Syllabus SPOT
ADES 2510.502Typography IISpring 2023 Syllabus SPOT
ADES 3510.502Interaction Design IFall 2022 Syllabus SPOT
ADES 1510.501Typography IFall 2022 Syllabus SPOT
ADES 3545.504Communication Design StudioSpring 2022 Syllabus SPOT
ADES 2510.502Typography IISpring 2022 Syllabus SPOT
ADES 3510.502Interaction Design IFall 2021 Syllabus SPOT
ADES 1510.501Typography IFall 2021 Syllabus SPOT
ADES 3545.504Communication Design StudioSpring 2021 Syllabus SPOT
ADES 2510.502Typography IISpring 2021 Syllabus SPOT
ADES 3510.502Interaction Design IFall 2020 Syllabus SPOT
ADES 4541.501Portfolio DevelopmentFall 2020 Syllabus SPOT
ADES 1510.501Typography IFall 2020 Syllabus SPOT
ADES 3545.504Communication Design StudioSpring 2020 Syllabus
ADES 2510.502Typography IISpring 2020 Syllabus
ADES 3510.501Interaction Design IFall 2019 Syllabus SPOT
ADES 1510.503Typography IFall 2019 Syllabus SPOT
Texas Education Code 51.974 (HB 2504) requires each institution of higher education to make available to the public, a syllabus for undergraduate lecture courses offered for credit by the institution.

Published Intellectual Contributions

    Book Chapter

  • Holeman, E.L. (2023). Design Note. Experience Design: A Participatory Manifesto. Yale University Press.
  • Holeman, E., Frumhoff, D. (2022). Designers as Data Activity. Professors at Play Playbook. dallasshow.org/project/teaching-learning-yearbook/

    • Cited Artwork

  • Holeman, E. (2017). Design Is Storytelling: Speculative Designs. Design Is Storytelling. (1) Cooper Hewitt, Smithsonian Design Museum.

    • Critical Review

  • Holeman, E.L. (2022). Moving Objects: A Cultural History of Emotive Design. London, Taylor & Francis Group. https://www.tandfonline.com/eprint/CMDIATJQXIGMVC5YF9K8/full?target=10.1080/17547075.2022.2038976

Contracts, Grants and Sponsored Research

    Fellowship

  • Holeman, E., "2021 Design Incubation Fellow: Reviews track," sponsored by Design Incubation, National, $300 Funded. (2021 - 2021).
  • Holeman, E., "2021 Design Incubation Fellow: Reviews track," sponsored by Design Incubation, National, Funded. (2021 - 2021).

    • Grant - Research

  • Holeman, E., "Small Grant: Fall 2022 Conference Funding," University of North Texas, $1903.86 Funded. ( - 2022).
  • Holeman, E., "Small Grant: Spring 2021 Competition Funding," University of North Texas, $1075 Funded. ( - 2021).
  • Holeman, E., "Small Grant: Spring 2021 Competition Funding," University of North Texas, $1075 Funded. ( - 2021).
  • Holeman, E., "Junior Faculty Summer Research Grant," University of North Texas, $5000 Funded. (2020 - 2020).
  • Holeman, E., "Small Grant," University of North Texas, $1075 Funded. ( - 2020).

    • Grant - Teaching

  • Holeman, E., "Design Incubation Writing Fellowship," University of North Texas, $300 Funded. ( - 2021).
,
Overall
Summative Rating		 Challenge and
Engagement Index		 Response Rate

out of 5
out of 7		 %
of
students responded
  • Overall Summative Rating (median):
    This rating represents the combined responses of students to the four global summative items and is presented to provide an overall index of the class’s quality. Overall summative statements include the following (response options include a Likert scale ranging from 5 = Excellent, 3 = Good, and 1= Very poor):
    • The course as a whole was
    • The course content was
    • The instructor’s contribution to the course was
    • The instructor’s effectiveness in teaching the subject matter was
  • Challenge and Engagement Index:
    This rating combines student responses to several SPOT items relating to how academically challenging students found the course to be and how engaged they were. Challenge and Engagement Index items include the following (response options include a Likert scale ranging from 7 = Much higher, 4 = Average, and 1 = Much lower):
    • Do you expect your grade in this course to be
    • The intellectual challenge presented was
    • The amount of effort you put into this course was
    • The amount of effort to succeed in this course was
    • Your involvement in course (doing assignments, attending classes, etc.) was
CLOSE