Skip to main content

Emily M. Hicks

Title: Adjunct Faculty

Department: Music History, Theory and Ethnomusicology

College: College of Music

Curriculum Vitae

Curriculum Vitae Link

Current Scheduled Teaching

MUMH 3520.002Issues in Western Music HistorySpring 2025
MUMH 5010.001Introduction to Research in MusicFall 2024
MUMH 1610.004Music as CommunicationFall 2024 Syllabus
MUMH 1610.006Music as CommunicationFall 2024 Syllabus

Previous Scheduled Teaching

MUMH 3500.003Music History and Literature to 1750Fall 2022 SPOT
MUMH 1610.001Music as CommunicationSpring 2022 Syllabus SPOT
MUMH 1610.001Music as CommunicationFall 2021 Syllabus SPOT
MUMH 1610.002Music as CommunicationSpring 2021 Syllabus SPOT
MUMH 1610.004Music as CommunicationFall 2020 Syllabus SPOT
MUMH 3510.301Music History and Literature Since 1750Spring 2020
MUMH 3510.304Music History and Literature Since 1750Spring 2020
MUMH 3510.302Music History and Literature Since 1750Fall 2019 SPOT
MUMH 3510.305Music History and Literature Since 1750Fall 2019 SPOT
MUMH 3010.001Twentieth Century MusicSpring 2019 Syllabus SPOT
MUMH 3000.001Nineteenth Century MusicFall 2018 Syllabus SPOT
MUMH 3510.301Music History and Literature Since 1750Spring 2018 SPOT
MUMH 3510.304Music History and Literature Since 1750Spring 2018 SPOT
MUMH 3510.301Music History and Literature Since 1750Fall 2017 SPOT
MUMH 3510.304Music History and Literature Since 1750Fall 2017 SPOT
,
Overall
Summative Rating
Challenge and
Engagement Index
Response Rate

out of 5

out of 7
%
of
students responded
  • Overall Summative Rating (median):
    This rating represents the combined responses of students to the four global summative items and is presented to provide an overall index of the class’s quality. Overall summative statements include the following (response options include a Likert scale ranging from 5 = Excellent, 3 = Good, and 1= Very poor):
    • The course as a whole was
    • The course content was
    • The instructor’s contribution to the course was
    • The instructor’s effectiveness in teaching the subject matter was
  • Challenge and Engagement Index:
    This rating combines student responses to several SPOT items relating to how academically challenging students found the course to be and how engaged they were. Challenge and Engagement Index items include the following (response options include a Likert scale ranging from 7 = Much higher, 4 = Average, and 1 = Much lower):
    • Do you expect your grade in this course to be
    • The intellectual challenge presented was
    • The amount of effort you put into this course was
    • The amount of effort to succeed in this course was
    • Your involvement in course (doing assignments, attending classes, etc.) was
CLOSE