Emily McKnight
Curriculum Vitae
Curriculum Vitae LinkEducation
-
PhD, Iowa State University, 2020
Major: Human Development and Family Studies
Dissertation: Deciding to Wait: Exploring the Lived Experiences and Relationship Processes Among African American Couples Who Remained Sexually Abstinent Until Marriage
Current Scheduled Teaching
| HDFS 4253.001 | Administration of Programs for Children, Youth and Families | Spring 2026 | ||
| HDFS 2313.001 | Courtship and Marriage | Spring 2026 | ||
| EPSY 6020.490 | Research Methods in Education | Spring 8W2 2026 | ||
| HDFS 2313.422 | Courtship and Marriage | Fall 2025 | Syllabus | |
| EPSY 5123.480 | Human Development Across the Life Span | Fall 8W1 2025 |
Texas Education Code 51.974 (HB 2504) requires each institution of higher education to make available to the public, a syllabus for undergraduate lecture courses offered for credit by the institution.
Previous Scheduled Teaching
| HDFS 2313.422 | Courtship and Marriage | Spring 2025 | Syllabus | SPOT |
| HDFS 4413.001 | Family Life Education | Spring 2025 | Syllabus | SPOT |
| HDFS 4253.001 | Administration of Programs for Children, Youth and Families | Fall 2024 | Syllabus | SPOT |
| HDFS 3153.001 | The Impact of Culture on Individuals and Families | Fall 2024 | Syllabus | SPOT |
Texas Education Code 51.974 (HB 2504) requires each institution of higher education to make available to the public, a syllabus for undergraduate lecture courses offered for credit by the institution.
| Overall Summative Rating |
Challenge and Engagement Index |
Response Rate |
|---|---|---|
out of 5 |
out of 7 |
% of students responded |
-
Overall Summative Rating (median):
This rating represents the combined responses of students to the four global summative items and is presented to provide an overall index of the class’s quality. Overall summative statements include the following (response options include a Likert scale ranging from 5 = Excellent, 3 = Good, and 1= Very poor):- The course as a whole was
- The course content was
- The instructor’s contribution to the course was
- The instructor’s effectiveness in teaching the subject matter was
-
Challenge and Engagement Index:
This rating combines student responses to several SPOT items relating to how academically challenging students found the course to be and how engaged they were. Challenge and Engagement Index items include the following (response options include a Likert scale ranging from 7 = Much higher, 4 = Average, and 1 = Much lower):- Do you expect your grade in this course to be
- The intellectual challenge presented was
- The amount of effort you put into this course was
- The amount of effort to succeed in this course was
- Your involvement in course (doing assignments, attending classes, etc.) was