Skip to main content

Evelyn Saru Jimmy

Title: Lecturer

Department: Technical Communication

College: College of Liberal Arts and Social Sciences

Curriculum Vitae

Curriculum Vitae Link

Education

  • PhD, University of Texas El Paso, 2022
    Major: Rhetoric and Composition Studies with emphasis on Rhetoric of Health and Medicine
  • MA, Central Michigan University, 2010
    Major: Interpersonal and Public Communication
  • BTech, Andrews University, 2001
    Major: Graphic Design and Digital Multimedia.

Current Scheduled Teaching

No current or future courses scheduled.

Previous Scheduled Teaching

TECM 1700.002Introduction to Professional, Science, and Technical WritingSpring 2023 Syllabus SPOT
TECM 1700.003Introduction to Professional, Science, and Technical WritingSpring 2023 Syllabus SPOT
TECM 2700.001Technical WritingSpring 2023 Syllabus SPOT
TECM 2700.031Technical WritingSpring 2023 Syllabus SPOT
TECM 1700.003Introduction to Professional, Science, and Technical WritingFall 2022 Syllabus SPOT
TECM 1700.004Introduction to Professional, Science, and Technical WritingFall 2022 Syllabus SPOT
TECM 2700.011Technical WritingFall 2022 Syllabus SPOT

Published Intellectual Contributions

    Journal Article

  • Saru Jimmy, E., Wojahn, P. (2020). “Glocalization” of Health Information: Considering Design Factors for Mobile Technologies in Malaysia.
  • Saru Jimmy, E. (2020). “Glocalization” of Health Information: Considering Design Factors for Mobile Technologies in Malaysia. Journal of Technical Writing and Communication, 50(2), 187-206. Journal of Technical Writing and Communication. 50 (2) 187 - 206. Sage.
,
Overall
Summative Rating
Challenge and
Engagement Index
Response Rate

out of 5

out of 7
%
of
students responded
  • Overall Summative Rating (median):
    This rating represents the combined responses of students to the four global summative items and is presented to provide an overall index of the class’s quality. Overall summative statements include the following (response options include a Likert scale ranging from 5 = Excellent, 3 = Good, and 1= Very poor):
    • The course as a whole was
    • The course content was
    • The instructor’s contribution to the course was
    • The instructor’s effectiveness in teaching the subject matter was
  • Challenge and Engagement Index:
    This rating combines student responses to several SPOT items relating to how academically challenging students found the course to be and how engaged they were. Challenge and Engagement Index items include the following (response options include a Likert scale ranging from 7 = Much higher, 4 = Average, and 1 = Much lower):
    • Do you expect your grade in this course to be
    • The intellectual challenge presented was
    • The amount of effort you put into this course was
    • The amount of effort to succeed in this course was
    • Your involvement in course (doing assignments, attending classes, etc.) was
CLOSE