Skip to main content

Evan S. Lawson

Title: Teaching Fellow

Department: Psychology

College: College of Liberal Arts and Social Sciences

Curriculum Vitae

Curriculum Vitae Link

Education

  • PhD, University of North Texas,
    Major: Counseling Psychology
  • MA, Sam Houston State University, 2019
    Major: Clinical Psychology
  • BS, Purdue University, 2017
    Major: Psychological Sciences

Current Scheduled Teaching

No current or future courses scheduled.

Previous Scheduled Teaching

PSYC 3650.305Experimental MethodsFall 2023 SPOT
PSYC 3650.313Experimental MethodsFall 2023 SPOT
PSYC 3317.310Quantitative Methods LabFall 2022 Syllabus SPOT
PSYC 3317.306Quantitative Methods LabSpring 2022 Syllabus SPOT
PSYC 3317.310Quantitative Methods LabFall 2021 Syllabus SPOT

Published Intellectual Contributions

    Journal Article

  • Evans-Hudnall, G., Odafe, M.O., Johnson, A., Armenti, N., O'Neil, N., Lawson, E., Trahan, L.H., Rassu, F.S. (2020). Using an adjunctive treatment to address psychological distress in a national weight management program: Results of an integrated pilot study.
  • Evans-Hudnall, G., Thakur, E., Amspoker, A., Dubbert, P., Trahan, L.H., Carges, E., Lawson, E., Nelson, C., Forsyth, J., Stanley, M.A. (2019). Improving attendance and behavior change in a weight loss program for veterans: Feasibility and acceptability of the HERO intervention.
  • Evans-Hudnall, G., Johnson, A., Kimmel, B., Brandt, C., Mbue, N., Lawson, E., Anderson, J. (2018). Feasibility and Effectiveness of an Integrated Cognitive Behavioral Treatment to Address Psychological Distress in a Stroke Self-Management Program.
  • Manuscript

  • Salami, T., Lawson, E., Metzger, I.W. (2020). The impact of microaggressions on black college students' worry about their future employment: The moderating role of social support and academic achievement..
,
Overall
Summative Rating
Challenge and
Engagement Index
Response Rate

out of 5

out of 7
%
of
students responded
  • Overall Summative Rating (median):
    This rating represents the combined responses of students to the four global summative items and is presented to provide an overall index of the class’s quality. Overall summative statements include the following (response options include a Likert scale ranging from 5 = Excellent, 3 = Good, and 1= Very poor):
    • The course as a whole was
    • The course content was
    • The instructor’s contribution to the course was
    • The instructor’s effectiveness in teaching the subject matter was
  • Challenge and Engagement Index:
    This rating combines student responses to several SPOT items relating to how academically challenging students found the course to be and how engaged they were. Challenge and Engagement Index items include the following (response options include a Likert scale ranging from 7 = Much higher, 4 = Average, and 1 = Much lower):
    • Do you expect your grade in this course to be
    • The intellectual challenge presented was
    • The amount of effort you put into this course was
    • The amount of effort to succeed in this course was
    • Your involvement in course (doing assignments, attending classes, etc.) was
CLOSE