Skip to main content

Fanju Meng

Title: Assistant Professor

Department: Biological Sciences

College: College of Science

Curriculum Vitae

Curriculum Vitae Link

Education

  • PhD, University of Rochester - School of Medicine and Dentistry, 2018
    Major: Genetics
    Dissertation: Regulation of Stem Cell Proliferatoin and Differentiation by Drosophila Sox21a and Sox100b in the Adult Intestine.
  • MS, University of Rochester - School of Medicine and Dentistry, 2015
    Major: Genetics
  • BS, Shandong University, 2012
    Major: Biology Science

Current Scheduled Teaching

BIOL 3451.002GeneticsSpring 2025
Texas Education Code 51.974 (HB 2504) requires each institution of higher education to make available to the public, a syllabus for undergraduate lecture courses offered for credit by the institution.

Previous Scheduled Teaching

No previous courses scheduled.

Texas Education Code 51.974 (HB 2504) requires each institution of higher education to make available to the public, a syllabus for undergraduate lecture courses offered for credit by the institution.

Published Intellectual Contributions

    Editoral Comment

  • Meng, F., Murphy, P.J. (2021). Rolling uphill: in vivo reacquisition of pluripotency during cranial neural crest differentiation.. Other. 4 (1) 626.

    • Editorial Comment

  • Meng, F., Biteau, B. (2017). There and back again: amitosis to repopulate a stem cell pool.. Other. 4 82.

    • Journal Article

  • Shi, H., Chen, S., Meng, F., Ossip, D.J., Yan, C., Li, D. Epigenome-wide DNA methylation profiling in comparison between pathological and physiological hypertrophy of human cardiomyocytes. Other. 14 Frontiers Media SA. http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fgene.2023.1264382
  • Halblander, F.N., Meng, F., Murphy, P.J. (2024). Anp32e protects against accumulation of H2A.Z at Sox motif containing promoters during zebrafish gastrulation. Developmental Biology. 507 34-43. Elsevier BV. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ydbio.2023.12.010
  • Meng, F., Murphy, K.E., Makowski, C.E., Delatte, B., Murphy, P.J. (2023). Competition for H2A.Z underlies the developmental impacts of repetitive element de-repression. Development. 150 (21) The Company of Biologists. http://dx.doi.org/10.1242/dev.202338
  • Akdogan-Ozdilek, B., Duval, K.L., Meng, F., Murphy, P.J., Goll, M.G. (2022). Identification of chromatin states during zebrafish gastrulation using CUT&RUN and CUT&Tag.. Other. 251 (4) 729-742.
  • Murphy, K.E., Meng, F., Makowski, C.E., Murphy, P.J. (2020). Genome-wide chromatin accessibility is restricted by ANP32E.. Nature Communications. 11 (1) 5063.
  • Meng, F., Rojas Villa, S.E., Biteau, B. (2020). Sox100B Regulates Progenitor-Specific Gene Expression and Cell Differentiation in the Adult Drosophila Intestine.. Other. 14 (2) 226-240.
  • Rojas Villa, S.E., Meng, F., Biteau, B. (2019). zfh2 controls progenitor cell activation and differentiation in the adult Drosophila intestinal absorptive lineage.. Other. 15 (12) e1008553.
  • Meng, F., Biteau, B. (2015). A Sox Transcription Factor Is a Critical Regulator of Adult Stem Cell Proliferation in the Drosophila Intestine.. Other. 13 (5) 906-14.

    • Pre-print

  • Blanc, R.S., Shah, N., Salama, N.A., Meng, F., Mousaei, A., Yang, B.A., Aguilar, C.A., Chakkalakal, J.V., Onukwufor, J.O., Murphy, P.J., Calvi, L., Dirksen, R. (2024). Epigenetic erosion of H4K20me1 induced by inflammation drives aged stem cell ferroptosis.. Research Square Platform LLC. http://dx.doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-3937628/v2
,
Overall
Summative Rating		 Challenge and
Engagement Index		 Response Rate

out of 5
out of 7		 %
of
students responded
  • Overall Summative Rating (median):
    This rating represents the combined responses of students to the four global summative items and is presented to provide an overall index of the class’s quality. Overall summative statements include the following (response options include a Likert scale ranging from 5 = Excellent, 3 = Good, and 1= Very poor):
    • The course as a whole was
    • The course content was
    • The instructor’s contribution to the course was
    • The instructor’s effectiveness in teaching the subject matter was
  • Challenge and Engagement Index:
    This rating combines student responses to several SPOT items relating to how academically challenging students found the course to be and how engaged they were. Challenge and Engagement Index items include the following (response options include a Likert scale ranging from 7 = Much higher, 4 = Average, and 1 = Much lower):
    • Do you expect your grade in this course to be
    • The intellectual challenge presented was
    • The amount of effort you put into this course was
    • The amount of effort to succeed in this course was
    • Your involvement in course (doing assignments, attending classes, etc.) was
CLOSE