Skip to main content

Giselle Greenidge

Title: Teaching Fellow

Department: Sociology

College: College of Liberal Arts and Social Sciences

Curriculum Vitae

Curriculum Vitae Link

Education

  • MS, University of North Texas, 2014
    Major: Merchandising
  • MS, Cameron University, 2012
    Major: Behavioral Sciences
  • BA, Cameron University, 2011
    Major: International Languages

Current Scheduled Teaching

No current or future courses scheduled.

Texas Education Code 51.974 (HB 2504) requires each institution of higher education to make available to the public, a syllabus for undergraduate lecture courses offered for credit by the institution.

Previous Scheduled Teaching

SOCI 3220.001Quantitative Data CollectionSpring 2019 Syllabus SPOT
SOCI 3220.900Quantitative Data CollectionFall 2018 Syllabus SPOT
SOCI 3300.900Urban SociologyFall 2018 Syllabus SPOT
SOCI 3000.901Sociology of Marriage and FamilySummer 5W1 2018 Syllabus SPOT
SOCI 3000.951Sociology of Marriage and FamilySummer 5W1 2018 SPOT
SOCI 2070.001Introduction to Race and Ethnic RelationsSpring 2018 Syllabus SPOT
SOCI 3800.001Sociology of WorkFall 2017 Syllabus SPOT
SOCI 3300.900Urban SociologyFall 2017 Syllabus SPOT
MDSE 4080.002Merchandising VenturesFall 2014 Syllabus
Texas Education Code 51.974 (HB 2504) requires each institution of higher education to make available to the public, a syllabus for undergraduate lecture courses offered for credit by the institution.
,
Overall
Summative Rating		 Challenge and
Engagement Index		 Response Rate

out of 5
out of 7		 %
of
students responded
  • Overall Summative Rating (median):
    This rating represents the combined responses of students to the four global summative items and is presented to provide an overall index of the class’s quality. Overall summative statements include the following (response options include a Likert scale ranging from 5 = Excellent, 3 = Good, and 1= Very poor):
    • The course as a whole was
    • The course content was
    • The instructor’s contribution to the course was
    • The instructor’s effectiveness in teaching the subject matter was
  • Challenge and Engagement Index:
    This rating combines student responses to several SPOT items relating to how academically challenging students found the course to be and how engaged they were. Challenge and Engagement Index items include the following (response options include a Likert scale ranging from 7 = Much higher, 4 = Average, and 1 = Much lower):
    • Do you expect your grade in this course to be
    • The intellectual challenge presented was
    • The amount of effort you put into this course was
    • The amount of effort to succeed in this course was
    • Your involvement in course (doing assignments, attending classes, etc.) was
CLOSE