Skip to main content

Glenisson F. de Oliveira

Title: Dean

Department: Honors College

College: University of North Texas

Curriculum Vitae

Curriculum Vitae Link

Education

  • PhD, Purdue University, 1998
    Major: Chemistry
    Specialization: Theoretical Physical Chemistry
  • BS, University of Florida, 1993
    Major: Chemistry

Current Scheduled Teaching

No current or future courses scheduled.

Previous Scheduled Teaching

HNRS 2900.701Special ProblemsSummer 10W 2018
HNRS 3996.701Honors College Mentored Research ExperienceSummer 5W1 2017
HNRS 2900.701Special ProblemsSummer 10W 2017
HNRS 3996.701Honors College Mentored Research ExperienceSummer 10W 2016
HNRS 2900.701Special ProblemsSummer 10W 2016
CHEM 4900.723Special ProblemsSummer 10W 2015

Published Intellectual Contributions

    Journal Article

  • de Oliveira, G.F. (2015). Higher Education Faculty Collaboration With K-12 Teachers as a Professional Development Experience for Faculty. Journal of College Science Teaching.
  • de Oliveira, G.F. (2002). Rotational spectrum of the weakly bonded C6H6–H2S dimer and comparisons to C6H6–H2O dimer.
  • de Oliveira, G.F. (1999). Towards standard methods for benchmark quality ab initio thermochemistry – W1 and W2 theory. Journal of Chemical Physics.

Contracts, Grants and Sponsored Research

    Grant - Teaching

  • Moen, W.E. (Principal), "University of North Texas McNair Program," sponsored by U.S. Department of Education, FED, Funded. (2012 - 2017).
,
Overall
Summative Rating
Challenge and
Engagement Index
Response Rate

out of 5

out of 7
%
of
students responded
  • Overall Summative Rating (median):
    This rating represents the combined responses of students to the four global summative items and is presented to provide an overall index of the class’s quality. Overall summative statements include the following (response options include a Likert scale ranging from 5 = Excellent, 3 = Good, and 1= Very poor):
    • The course as a whole was
    • The course content was
    • The instructor’s contribution to the course was
    • The instructor’s effectiveness in teaching the subject matter was
  • Challenge and Engagement Index:
    This rating combines student responses to several SPOT items relating to how academically challenging students found the course to be and how engaged they were. Challenge and Engagement Index items include the following (response options include a Likert scale ranging from 7 = Much higher, 4 = Average, and 1 = Much lower):
    • Do you expect your grade in this course to be
    • The intellectual challenge presented was
    • The amount of effort you put into this course was
    • The amount of effort to succeed in this course was
    • Your involvement in course (doing assignments, attending classes, etc.) was
CLOSE