Skip to main content

Greg G. Hardin

Curriculum Vitae

Curriculum Vitae Link

Education

  • MLS, Texas Woman's University, 2000
    Major: Library and Information Studies
  • BS, University of Idaho, 1993
    Major: Communication
    Specialization: Photography and Film

Current Scheduled Teaching

No current or future courses scheduled.

Previous Scheduled Teaching

No previous courses scheduled.

Published Intellectual Contributions

    Conference Proceeding

  • Campbell, D., Hardin, G. (2019). Incorporating Propaganda Analysis in the Use of the Framework for Information Literacy for Higher Education in a Post-Truth Era. Texas Library Journal. Summer 2019 (Special Issue) 123-126. Austin, TX, Texas Library Association. https://issuu.com/txlibraryassociation/docs/tlj_summer-special_issue-contribute
  • Encyclopedia Article

  • Hardin, G.G. (2024). Disinformation, Misinformation, and Fake News; the latest trends and issues in research. Encyclopedia of Libraries, Librarianship, and Information Science (ELLIS).
  • Infographic Handout

  • Henson, B., Hardin, G., Hardin, C., Harker, K., Richardson, J. (2019). Information Literacy & Student Learning Outcomes Infographic Handout. Other. Where Does Information Literacy Fit? Mapping the Core. Association of College and Research Libraries/ American Library Association. https://sandbox.acrl.org/library-collection/information-literacy-student-learning-outcomes-infographics
  • Infographic Poster

  • Henson, B., Hardin, G., Hargis, C., Harker, K., Richardson, J. (2019). Information Literacy & Student Learning Outcomes Infographic Poster. Other. Where Does Information Literacy Fit? Mapping the Core. Association of College and Research Libraries/ American Library Association. https://sandbox.acrl.org/library-collection/information-literacy-student-learning-outcomes-infographics
  • Journal Article

  • Roy, L., Hardin, G.G. (2015). Teaching the Catalog as a Reference Tool. The Reference Librarian. 56 (1) 73–77. Taylor & Francis. http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/02763877.2015.972915
  • Hardin, G.G., Klug, B., Williams, U. (2012). Pioneering new directions: Creating a social media strategy. Texas Library Journal. 88 (2) 83–86. http://www.txla.org/sites/tla/files/TLJ/TLJ-88-2.pdf
  • Research Report

  • Martin, R.S., Brown, S.L., Claes, J., Gray, C.A., Hardin, G.G., Judkins, T.C., Kingrey, K.P., Latham, C., Lindsey, T.K., Rogers, J., others. (2000). The impact of outsourcing and privatization on library services and management. Other. 111. Chicago, IL, American Library Association. http://www.ala.org/tools/sites/ala.org.tools/files/content/outsourcing/outsourcing_doc.pdf
  • Technical Report

  • Hardin, G., Hargis, C.N., Henson, B. (2017). Information Fluency Initiative: Curriculum Mapping Group Procedures and Timeline Report. 21. https://digital.library.unt.edu/ark:/67531/metadc1703586/
  • Webpage

  • Hardin, G. (2020). Beta Phi Mu, Beta Lambda Chapter Facebook Page.. https://www.facebook.com/pg/bpmbetalambda/
  • White Paper

  • Hardin, G.G. (2016). White Paper: University of North Texas, Information Fluency Initiative. 25. http://digital.library.unt.edu/ark:/67531/metadc944367/

Contracts, Grants and Sponsored Research

    Grant - Research

  • Andrews, P. (Principal), Hardin, G.G. (Supporting), Smith, S. (Supporting), "Dean's Innovation Grant," University of North Texas, $2500 Funded. (2016 - 2017).
  • Andrews, P., Hardin, G.G., Smith, S., "What’s Brewing at UNT," sponsored by University of North Texas Libraries Dean’s Innovation Grant, University of North Texas, $2500 Funded. (2016 - 2017).
  • Grant - Service

  • Martin, J.E. (Principal), O'Keefe, L.M. (Supporting), Hardin, G. (Supporting), "Dean's Innovation Grant," sponsored by UNT Libraries, University of North Texas, $5000 Funded. (2017 - 2018).
,
Overall
Summative Rating
Challenge and
Engagement Index
Response Rate

out of 5

out of 7
%
of
students responded
  • Overall Summative Rating (median):
    This rating represents the combined responses of students to the four global summative items and is presented to provide an overall index of the class’s quality. Overall summative statements include the following (response options include a Likert scale ranging from 5 = Excellent, 3 = Good, and 1= Very poor):
    • The course as a whole was
    • The course content was
    • The instructor’s contribution to the course was
    • The instructor’s effectiveness in teaching the subject matter was
  • Challenge and Engagement Index:
    This rating combines student responses to several SPOT items relating to how academically challenging students found the course to be and how engaged they were. Challenge and Engagement Index items include the following (response options include a Likert scale ranging from 7 = Much higher, 4 = Average, and 1 = Much lower):
    • Do you expect your grade in this course to be
    • The intellectual challenge presented was
    • The amount of effort you put into this course was
    • The amount of effort to succeed in this course was
    • Your involvement in course (doing assignments, attending classes, etc.) was
CLOSE