Skip to main content

Gavin Cox

Title: Adjunct Faculty

Department: English

College: College of Liberal Arts and Social Sciences

Curriculum Vitae

Curriculum Vitae Link

Education

  • MA, Southern New Hampshire University, 2018
    Major: English
  • MBA, University of Texas at Dallas, 1995
    Major: Business Administration

Current Scheduled Teaching

ENGL 1310.015First Year Writing ISpring 2025
ENGL 1320.027First Year Writing IISpring 2025
ENGL 1320.037First Year Writing IISpring 2025
ENGL 1320.054First Year Writing IISpring 2025
ENGL 1310.022First Year Writing IFall 2024 Syllabus
ENGL 1320.002First Year Writing IIFall 2024 Syllabus
ENGL 1320.033First Year Writing IIFall 2024 Syllabus
ENGL 1320.036First Year Writing IIFall 2024 Syllabus
Texas Education Code 51.974 (HB 2504) requires each institution of higher education to make available to the public, a syllabus for undergraduate lecture courses offered for credit by the institution.

Previous Scheduled Teaching

ENGL 1310.007First Year Writing ISpring 2024 Syllabus SPOT
ENGL 1310.035First Year Writing ISpring 2024 Syllabus SPOT
ENGL 1310.037First Year Writing ISpring 2024 Syllabus SPOT
ENGL 1320.035First Year Writing IISpring 2024 Syllabus SPOT
ENGL 1310.074First Year Writing IFall 2023 Syllabus SPOT
Texas Education Code 51.974 (HB 2504) requires each institution of higher education to make available to the public, a syllabus for undergraduate lecture courses offered for credit by the institution.
,
Overall
Summative Rating		 Challenge and
Engagement Index		 Response Rate

out of 5
out of 7		 %
of
students responded
  • Overall Summative Rating (median):
    This rating represents the combined responses of students to the four global summative items and is presented to provide an overall index of the class’s quality. Overall summative statements include the following (response options include a Likert scale ranging from 5 = Excellent, 3 = Good, and 1= Very poor):
    • The course as a whole was
    • The course content was
    • The instructor’s contribution to the course was
    • The instructor’s effectiveness in teaching the subject matter was
  • Challenge and Engagement Index:
    This rating combines student responses to several SPOT items relating to how academically challenging students found the course to be and how engaged they were. Challenge and Engagement Index items include the following (response options include a Likert scale ranging from 7 = Much higher, 4 = Average, and 1 = Much lower):
    • Do you expect your grade in this course to be
    • The intellectual challenge presented was
    • The amount of effort you put into this course was
    • The amount of effort to succeed in this course was
    • Your involvement in course (doing assignments, attending classes, etc.) was
CLOSE