Skip to main content

Greg Mallett

Title: Clinical Assistant Professor

Department: Kinesiology, Health Promotion and Recreation

College: College of Education

Curriculum Vitae

Curriculum Vitae Link

Current Scheduled Teaching

KINE 4200.002Basic Athletic TrainingSpring 2025
KINE 3050.003BiomechanicsSpring 2025
KINE 3050.401BiomechanicsSpring 3W1 2025
KINE 2105.001Human Anatomy and Physiology for the movement sciencesSpring 2025
KINE 2105.002Human Anatomy and Physiology for the movement sciencesSpring 2025
KINE 3050.001BiomechanicsFall 2024 Syllabus
KINE 3050.002BiomechanicsFall 2024 Syllabus
KINE 2105.001Human Anatomy and Physiology for the movement sciencesFall 2024 Syllabus
KINE 2105.002Human Anatomy and Physiology for the movement sciencesFall 2024 Syllabus
Texas Education Code 51.974 (HB 2504) requires each institution of higher education to make available to the public, a syllabus for undergraduate lecture courses offered for credit by the institution.

Previous Scheduled Teaching

No previous courses scheduled.

Texas Education Code 51.974 (HB 2504) requires each institution of higher education to make available to the public, a syllabus for undergraduate lecture courses offered for credit by the institution.

Published Intellectual Contributions

    Journal Article

  • Mallett, G. (2024). Effect of Endurance Exercise on Markers of Oxidative Stress - A Systematic Review. Journal of Science in Sport and Exercise. 6 (3)
  • Mallett, G. (2023). Young Females’ Longitudinal Relationship of Endurance Performance - A Partial Regression Analysis. 12 (4) 48-56.
,
Overall
Summative Rating		 Challenge and
Engagement Index		 Response Rate

out of 5
out of 7		 %
of
students responded
  • Overall Summative Rating (median):
    This rating represents the combined responses of students to the four global summative items and is presented to provide an overall index of the class’s quality. Overall summative statements include the following (response options include a Likert scale ranging from 5 = Excellent, 3 = Good, and 1= Very poor):
    • The course as a whole was
    • The course content was
    • The instructor’s contribution to the course was
    • The instructor’s effectiveness in teaching the subject matter was
  • Challenge and Engagement Index:
    This rating combines student responses to several SPOT items relating to how academically challenging students found the course to be and how engaged they were. Challenge and Engagement Index items include the following (response options include a Likert scale ranging from 7 = Much higher, 4 = Average, and 1 = Much lower):
    • Do you expect your grade in this course to be
    • The intellectual challenge presented was
    • The amount of effort you put into this course was
    • The amount of effort to succeed in this course was
    • Your involvement in course (doing assignments, attending classes, etc.) was
CLOSE