Faculty Profile

Hae Jin Gam

Hae Jin Gam

Title
Associate Professor
Department
Design
College
College of Visual Arts and Design

    

Education

PhD, Oklahoma State University, 2007.
Major: Human Environmental Sciences
Degree Specialization: Apparel Design & Merchandising
Dissertation Title: Development of a Sustainable Apparel Design and Production Model
MS, Chung-Ang University, 2002.
Major: Clothing and Textiles
Degree Specialization: Fashion Design
Dissertation Title: Survey and Study on Preference of Fashion, Style and Knitwear of Bobos Men
BS, Seoul Women’s University, 1998.
Major: Computer Sciences

Current Scheduled Teaching*

ADES 3570.501, Computers in Fashion : Presentation, Fall 2020 Syllabus
ADES 3570.502, Computers in Fashion : Presentation, Fall 2020 Syllabus
ADES 4560.001, Fashion Design Concepts, Fall 2020 Syllabus
ART 5900.717, Special Problems, Fall 2020

* Texas Education Code 51.974 (HB 2504) requires each institution of higher education to make available to the public, a syllabus for undergraduate lecture courses offered for credit by the institution.

Previous Scheduled Teaching*

ADES 3565.501, Fashion Accessories, Spring 2020 Syllabus
ADES 3555.501, Fashion: Industry Techniques, Spring 2020 Syllabus
ADES 3555.502, Fashion: Industry Techniques, Spring 2020 Syllabus
ADES 4560.001, Fashion Design Concepts, Fall 2019 Syllabus SPOT
ADES 4560.002, Fashion Design Concepts, Fall 2019 Syllabus SPOT
ART 5900.717, Special Problems, Fall 2019
ADES 2560.502, Fashion Design: Advanced Industrial Sewing Techniques, Spring 2019 Syllabus SPOT
ADES 3555.501, Fashion: Industry Techniques, Spring 2019 Syllabus SPOT
ADES 3555.502, Fashion: Industry Techniques, Spring 2019 Syllabus SPOT
ADES 3565.501, Fashion Accessories, Fall 2018 Syllabus SPOT
ADES 1560.503, Fashion Design: Introduction to Industrial Sewing Techniques, Fall 2018 Syllabus SPOT

* Texas Education Code 51.974 (HB 2504) requires each institution of higher education to make available to the public, a syllabus for undergraduate lecture courses offered for credit by the institution.

,
Overall
Summative Rating
Challenge and
Engagement Index
Response Rate

out of 5

out of 7
%
of
students responded
  • Overall Summative Rating (median):
    This rating represents the combined responses of students to the four global summative items and is presented to provide an overall index of the class’s quality. Overall summative statements include the following (response options include a Likert scale ranging from 5 = Excellent, 3 = Good, and 1= Very poor):
    • The course as a whole was
    • The course content was
    • The instructor’s contribution to the course was
    • The instructor’s effectiveness in teaching the subject matter was
  • Challenge and Engagement Index:
    This rating combines student responses to several SPOT items relating to how academically challenging students found the course to be and how engaged they were. Challenge and Engagement Index items include the following (response options include a Likert scale ranging from 7 = Much higher, 4 = Average, and 1 = Much lower):
    • Do you expect your grade in this course to be
    • The intellectual challenge presented was
    • The amount of effort you put into this course was
    • The amount of effort to succeed in this course was
    • Your involvement in course (doing assignments, attending classes, etc.) was
CLOSE