Skip to main content

Harrison Gaebler

Title: Visiting Assistant Professor

Department: Mathematics

College: College of Science

Curriculum Vitae

Curriculum Vitae Link

Education

  • PhD, University of Kansas, 2021
    Major: Mathematics
    Dissertation: Optimal L2 Bounds for Certain Hamiltonian Linearizations and New Generalizations of Asymptotic Structures in Certain Banach Spaces
  • MA, University of Kansas, 2017
    Major: Mathematics
  • BA, Rice University, 2015
    Major: Mathematics

Current Scheduled Teaching

MATH 2000.003Discrete MathematicsSpring 2025
MATH 1710.120Calculus IFall 2024 Syllabus
MATH 1710.121Calculus IFall 2024
MATH 1710.122Calculus IFall 2024
MATH 1710.123Calculus IFall 2024

Previous Scheduled Teaching

MATH 2000.003Discrete MathematicsSpring 2024 Syllabus SPOT
MATH 1650.623Pre CalculusFall 2023 Syllabus SPOT
MATH 1100.140AlgebraSpring 2023 Syllabus SPOT
MATH 1710.110Calculus ISpring 2023 Syllabus SPOT
MATH 1710.160Calculus IFall 2022 Syllabus SPOT

Published Intellectual Contributions

    Journal Article

  • Gaebler , H. (2022). Growth of Orbits for Operator Semigroups on Banach Spaces with Schauder Bases.
  • Gaebler , H. (2021). NLS and KdV Hamiltonian Linearized Operators: A Priori Bounds on the Spectrum and Optimal L2 Estimates for the Semigroups. Physica D: Nonlinear Phenomena.
  • Gaebler , H. (2021). Towards a Characterization of the Property of Lebesgue. Real Analysis Exchange.
,
Overall
Summative Rating
Challenge and
Engagement Index
Response Rate

out of 5

out of 7
%
of
students responded
  • Overall Summative Rating (median):
    This rating represents the combined responses of students to the four global summative items and is presented to provide an overall index of the class’s quality. Overall summative statements include the following (response options include a Likert scale ranging from 5 = Excellent, 3 = Good, and 1= Very poor):
    • The course as a whole was
    • The course content was
    • The instructor’s contribution to the course was
    • The instructor’s effectiveness in teaching the subject matter was
  • Challenge and Engagement Index:
    This rating combines student responses to several SPOT items relating to how academically challenging students found the course to be and how engaged they were. Challenge and Engagement Index items include the following (response options include a Likert scale ranging from 7 = Much higher, 4 = Average, and 1 = Much lower):
    • Do you expect your grade in this course to be
    • The intellectual challenge presented was
    • The amount of effort you put into this course was
    • The amount of effort to succeed in this course was
    • Your involvement in course (doing assignments, attending classes, etc.) was
CLOSE