Skip to main content

Hamed Jalali

Title: Teaching Fellow

Department: Computer Science and Engineering

College: College of Engineering

Curriculum Vitae

Curriculum Vitae Link

Education

  • MS, University of North Texas, 2023
    Major: Computer Science

Current Scheduled Teaching

No current or future courses scheduled.

Texas Education Code 51.974 (HB 2504) requires each institution of higher education to make available to the public, a syllabus for undergraduate lecture courses offered for credit by the institution.

Previous Scheduled Teaching

CSCE 4460.001Software Testing and Empirical MethodologiesSpring 2026 Syllabus SPOT
CSCE 5460.001Software Testing and Empirical MethodologiesSpring 2026 SPOT
CSCE 3444.003Software EngineeringFall 2025 Syllabus SPOT
CSCE 4460.001Software Testing and Empirical MethodologiesSummer 10W 2025 Syllabus SPOT
CSCE 4460.001Software Testing and Empirical MethodologiesSpring 2025 Syllabus SPOT
CSCE 5460.001Software Testing and Empirical MethodologiesSpring 2025 SPOT
CSCE 5460.600Software Testing and Empirical MethodologiesSpring 2025 SPOT
Texas Education Code 51.974 (HB 2504) requires each institution of higher education to make available to the public, a syllabus for undergraduate lecture courses offered for credit by the institution.

Published Intellectual Contributions

    Journal Article

  • Jalali, H., Aljedaani, W., Ludi, S.A. (2025). The Evolution of Software Usability in Developer Communities: An Empirical Study on Stack Overflow. Journal of Software. 4 (4) 27. Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute. https://www.mdpi.com/2674-113X/4/4/27
  • Jalali, H., Aljedaani, W., Ludi, S.A. (2024). Analyzing Usability Discussions in Stack Overflow Posts: An Empirical Investigation Based on Nielsen's Heuristics.
  • Aljedaani, W., Jalali, H., Ludi, S.A. (2024). Understanding developer challenges and trends in web accessibility: a stack overflow analysis.
,
Overall
Summative Rating		 Challenge and
Engagement Index		 Response Rate

out of 5
out of 7		 %
of
students responded
  • Overall Summative Rating (median):
    This rating represents the combined responses of students to the four global summative items and is presented to provide an overall index of the class’s quality. Overall summative statements include the following (response options include a Likert scale ranging from 5 = Excellent, 3 = Good, and 1= Very poor):
    • The course as a whole was
    • The course content was
    • The instructor’s contribution to the course was
    • The instructor’s effectiveness in teaching the subject matter was
  • Challenge and Engagement Index:
    This rating combines student responses to several SPOT items relating to how academically challenging students found the course to be and how engaged they were. Challenge and Engagement Index items include the following (response options include a Likert scale ranging from 7 = Much higher, 4 = Average, and 1 = Much lower):
    • Do you expect your grade in this course to be
    • The intellectual challenge presented was
    • The amount of effort you put into this course was
    • The amount of effort to succeed in this course was
    • Your involvement in course (doing assignments, attending classes, etc.) was
CLOSE